Western Free Press: NEED TO KNOW NOW!

Print

**URGENT CALL TO ACTION** [Mere] Hours Until Obama Illegally Surrenders Control of Internet Forever

 

urgentcover

Editor’s Note: The Western Free Press posted about the future of regulation of the Internet on September 28, 2016. I am passing their article on to our readers in hopes of increasing “people-pressure” on the idiots in our national government who haven’t a clue (or who do have a clue, but just don’t care anyway). Please read their article here —

http://www.westernfreepress.com/2016/09/28/urgent-call-action-48-hours-obama-illegally-surrenders-control-internet-forever/

Excerpts:

On October 1st, Barack Hussein Obama intends to illegally turn over control of the American taxpayer funded, American Department of Defense designed, American built, American owned World Wide Web to an international body that could very well be an arm of the United Nations, according to the Wall Street Journal.

When the Obama administration announced its plan to give up U.S. protection of the internet, it promised the United Nations would never take control. But because of the administration’s naiveté or arrogance, U.N. control is the likely result if the U.S. gives up internet stewardship as planned at midnight on Sept. 30.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz is leading the resistance against the Obama administration’s unconstitutional bypass of Congress in a decision he called “likely illegal” at a recent Heritage Foundation event.

“Who in their right mind looks at the Internet and says, ‘You know what we need. We need Russia to have more control over this.’ What is the thought process behind that? And I might note what the Obama administration is doing is also likely illegal. The United States Constitution prohibits transferring government property to anyone else without the authorization of Congress.” – Cruz

**URGENT** Locate and contact your Congressional Representative HERE

I have put together a text for anyone who does not have the time to assemble their own in this critical task…

(snip) Please read the article at Western Free Press and use their furnished sample letter. 


 

Additional from the American Free Press:

U.S. Lawmakers Aim to Block Obama’s Internet Giveaway

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/24041-u-s-lawmakers-aim-to-block-obama-s-internet-giveaway

Excerpt from their article:

With Obama illegally plotting to hand over a crucial piece of the Internet’s architecture to a United Nations-style outfit before he leaves office — and potentially crush Internet freedom as we know it in the process — Republicans in Congress are fighting back. Among other serious concerns, lawmakers have been warning that giving up control of ICANN, which manages the assignment of website domains, could open the door to Internet censorship by the UN and its oftentimes totalitarian member governments. Other critics have warned of potential international taxes levied by UN agencies.

(snip) Please read whole article at link above.


 

Update from Oath Keeper Lyle Rapacki, Ph.D., Founder and owner of
Sentinel Intelligence Services
Lyle’s website: http://www.sentinelintelligenceservices.com/About-Us.html

 

FOR YOUR IMMEDIATE ANALYSIS AND CONSIDERATION
September 29 2016
Earlier today, the Attorney Generals in the States of Arizona, Texas, Oklahoma, and Nevada filed an emergency action in Federal Court petitioning the delay of the Obama administration’s proposed release of the Internet agency solely responsible for Internet Assigned Numbers and Addresses in the United States of America to an international authority overseen by the United Nations.  Obama’s plan would consign the critical function of governance of the Internet to the international community coordinated by the United Nations, thereby rendering the Internet vulnerable to censorship by unknown foreign powers regardless of whatever rules and policies are in effect.  This action would have a direct ability to “effectively enable or prohibit (free) speech on the Internet.”
Quoting from the emergency petition, “ICANN has a documented history of ignoring or operating outside of its governing bylaws.  In addition, even under NTIA’s (National Telecommunications and Information Administration) oversight, ICANN’s current practices often foster a lack of transparency that, in turn, allows illegal activity to occur.”
The emergency petition filed under this date is a most serious and critical attempt to STOP the American Internet from being collapsed into the global community, and away from the oversight and general maintenance so respected and enjoyed all these years.  The plan to transfer the Internet into global hands is a potential National Security threat as well.

(end update)


Salute! to Nancy Oakley for fetching this one.

annie-oakley

Categories: Academy-MindWar, All, Featured

About Author

Elias Alias

Editor in Chief for Oath Keepers; Unemployed poet; Lover of Nature and Nature's beauty. Slave to all cats. Reading interests include study of hidden history, classical literature. Concerned Constitutional American. Honorably discharged USMC Viet Nam Veteran. Founder, TheMentalMilitia.Net

Comments

  1. Chip 30 September, 2016, 03:41

    Now would be a good time to “meet on the mall”…I really do wonder where our red line is, and if we even have one.

    Reply this comment
    • Vinny 30 September, 2016, 15:04

      Chip…..I have wondered where that red line is for quite some time. Soetoro Sobarkah has been steamrolling this entire Nation for almost 8 years without any resistance and continues to do it as he sees fit. Not all, but the majority of our Elected Senators and Congressmen are as worthless as whale sh*t and offer no worthwhile resistance to the daily dismantling of our Republic. I truly fear for our Sovereign Constitutional Republic….I personally think we are at that red line.

      Reply this comment
      • Chip 30 September, 2016, 19:53

        We’ve got to get our local teams up to speed…we need to be smarter.

        Reply this comment
    • Iconoclast 30 September, 2016, 21:05

      There are no lines that the Republican conservatives can agree upon. As “Witness” author Whitaker Chambers told his wife when he decided to leave the CPUSA (Communist Party USA) and became an anti communist: “I am leaving the winning side (CPUSA) and joining the losing side……..that’s us, my friends. We’ve allowed ourselves to be seduced by glossy ACA voting records and soothing rhetoric, mostly behind closed doors, telling us what glorious deed they would do once they gained control of Congress (in the 60s that was the party line). The thought has occurred to me that it’s just too damn good a job for them to jeopardize for mere principles. Within weeks we’ll find out if the US even has a chance to survive! Sen. Sanders success in the democrat primaries caused not so much as a whisper of resistance from the REPUBLICANS. Is there really anything else that needs to be said beyond that? I don’t think so.

      Reply this comment
  2. JimTh 30 September, 2016, 05:31

    I always get a kick out of politicians like Ted Cruz that wait until the 11th hour to try to do something. Could it be that Cruz, like the rest of the elite political establishment, really have no interest in rocking the political boat because they are also passengers. If this was so important to him why didn’t he start rallying his troops back when it was first proposed. Typical freakin nonsense of a politician…not an “American”.

    Reply this comment
    • Bailey 30 September, 2016, 07:31

      I love TED but he seems to be less relevant now than ever

      Reply this comment
      • Tuaca 30 September, 2016, 17:48

        The one and ONLY reason the Cubanadian is endorsing Trump is because he was told by the RNC “You don’t honor your pledge and you will not run for office next time”.

        Bought and paid for Cruz wanted more undocumented “immigrants”

        Reply this comment
    • Bruce Parker 30 September, 2016, 08:26

      Jim Th, If you had been paying attention, you would have Know that Senator Cruz has been speaking out about this issue for at Least 6 months, And He is the Only member of Congress to introduce legislation to Stop This Transfer from Happening. Mitch McConnel wouldn’t allow that Bill to be attached to the Continuing Resolution which passed both houses a few days ago, funding the Government through December 9th.

      Reply this comment
    • FlaJarHead 30 September, 2016, 14:19

      Jim Th, Ted Cruz has been speaking, working, and fighting this for several months now. Sad that so many drank the Trump KoolAid “Lyin Ted” instead of listening to what the most qualified and ONLY proven conservative was all about.

      Reply this comment
      • WGP 30 September, 2016, 19:44

        Cruz seemed to lie more than Hillary. So, even though we like his out spoken constitutional stance, it’s hard to trust him. And no one is swallowing any KoolAid. The wild support for Trump is mainly founded on that Trump is anti establishment – a non politico mouth piece with no obligatory allegiance to donors and is venting his strong anti PC positions on immigration, taxation, supporting vets and military, anti-obummer care, and solutions with plans. He did not become successful on the backs of donors and our taxes. On a personal note, just me, I don’t particularly care for the preacher preaching at me, where Trump has a passionate disdain for the direction this country is headed with current establishment globalists sit on their thumbs congress, white house muslim islamic terrorist sympathizer, and anti-constitutionailist PC supreme court. Sad that so many Cruzers are hell bent to see Hitlery elected.

        Reply this comment
      • CRB 1 October, 2016, 05:27

        You sound just like the liberal fools spouting off lies they know apply to them. Cruz is nothing more than a wolf in sheeps clothing. It’s YOU that has drank the koolaid, without even knowing it, and you’ve got in line with all the rest of the sheeple. Go spout off to some libturds, they might actually appreciate your rhetoric & B.S.

        Reply this comment
  3. Bruce Parker 30 September, 2016, 08:30

    Senator Tsd Cruz has been warning about this tra sfer for at least 6 months now, and be even Introduced a bill in the Senate to Block it! Senate Manority Leader Mitch McConnel Blocked Cruz’s Internet Freedom Bill from being voted on or included in the Continuing Resolution passed a few days ago.

    Reply this comment
  4. WGP 30 September, 2016, 09:18

    No one will do anything. There is no outrage. Everyone is asleep with status quo decline of our rights and freedoms. Look what the left media did to Savage this week? Does anyone care? Apparently not. Look what the traitor in the WH said at his UN address, scolding the US for being a sovereign nation and scolding Americans for being patriotic. Your texting and email will cease to exist as well. If it is digital, it will be blocked. In the meantime, there is a movement to build an unblockable internet web.

    I suggest it is too late to do much. When the tyrannical dictator in the WH and his cronies unplugs the internet, news will only be MSM print and what one can get from over the air from crooked MSM. Americans will be in the dark, no truth will be available as we know it now. Look at the censoring on Facebook, and Youtube and twitter and Google and all the other globalist owned media. Any and all conservative, right wing, Christian based, patriotic, constitutional, etc type web sites will be blocked. The news will end. Only leftist propaganda brainwashing. Open conversation will end. The truth will end. Prepare for it. Plan on it. Don’t be naive.

    Reply this comment
    • WGP 30 September, 2016, 13:20

      Check out BlockStack.org It is in beta development:

      With the Blockstack Core software, a network of computers collectively maintain a global registry of domain names, public keys, and cryptographic hashes. With this registry, Blockstack Core serves as a decentralized domain name system (DNS) and decentralized public key infrastructure (PKI).

      When you run a Blockstack Core node, you join this network, which is more secure by design than traditional naming and digital registry systems. This is because the system’s registry and its records are secured by an underlying blockchain, which is extremely resilient against tampering and control.

      In the Blockstack Core registry, each of the names has an owner, represented by a cryptographic keypair, and is associated with instructions for how DNS resolvers and other software should resolve the name.

      Blockstack Core’s DNS + PKI provides:

      name lookups on a decentralized naming system
      name registrations and transfers without centralized registrars
      automatic binding of names to owning cryptographic keypairs
      automatic cache invalidation
      immunity to cache poisoning
      robust certificate pinning capabilities
      resistance to censorship of name registration and resolution

      Reply this comment
      • Jeanette 30 September, 2016, 19:26

        WGP – Thanks for this information; I had never seen it before. I’ve saved your comment on my hard drive in case I can’t see it here soon, and will take a look at the website tomorrow.

        I’m assuming that we won’t suddenly find ourselves cut off from the internet within a day or two; after that we probably couldn’t even GET to BlockStack.org.

        Reply this comment
        • WGP 1 October, 2016, 07:11

          At this point it is in beta and a bit (pun) geeky. I hope they get it up to where it is more plug n play soonly!

          Reply this comment
  5. Cal 30 September, 2016, 09:21

    Our government is one of DELEGATED authority. No one who serves within the American governments were given the authority, or ownership of, anything that belongs to and is used by the people.

    Any person who lawfully serves as a US President (which this one is NOT) has these powers that come with and from the office itself – hence NO ONE serving here was given the authority to even give away that which they are ALLOWED to use while serving – elected, hired, contracted, etc. Caps below are mine.

    US Constitution, Article 2, Section 2: “The President SHALL BE commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES; he may require the opinion, in writing, of the principal officer in each of the executive departments, upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.

    He shall have power, BY AND WITH THE ADVICE AND CONSENT OF THE SENATE, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments.

    The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting commissions which shall expire at the end of their next session.

    Section 3: He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.”

    No where is seen where any person who serves as a US President can make wars – he (generic “he”) cannot that is given to the congress, has the authority to give the presidency extra powers – such as Assassination Powers which is First Degree Murder; make treaties or any type of agreement on the behalf of our nation/the American people with foreign entities or foreign nations; he cannot give away/sell/trade/etc our lakes, our nations boundaries, our land, our minerals, etc; nor can he decide who is allowed to come into this nation; nor can he decide who is allowed to be a lawful citizen of this nation; he has no authority to give/sell/trade/etc any weapons of war or any weapons at all; he has no authority over the internet, over health care, etc. He was not given the authority to give military weapons or any other type of weapons to any foreign entity, foreign government, foreign group, or to any law enforcement agency – state or federal. Etc.

    Alexander Hamilton: “The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is, that it shall not change the Constitution… On natural principles, a treaty, which should manifestly betray or sacrifice primary interests of the state, would be null.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “In giving to the President and Senate a power to make treaties, the Constitution meant only to authorize them to carry into effect, by way of treaty, any powers they might constitutionally exercise.”

    Thomas Jefferson: “Surely the President and Senate cannot do by treaty what the whole government is interdicted from doing in any way.”

    John Jay, Federalist 64 says that treaties relate to “war, peace, and to commerce” and to the promotion of “trade and navigation”.

    Madison, Federalist 42 says treaties also relate to sending and receiving ambassadors and consuls and to commerce.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “… a treaty cannot be made which alters the Constitution or which infringes any express exceptions to the power of the Constitution of the United States.”

    Alexander Hamilton, concerning the supremacy clause, Federalist 33: “It will not, I presume, have escaped observation that it expressly confines the supremacy to laws made pursuant to the Constitution.”

    Alexander Hamilton: “There is no position which depends on clearer principles that that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.”

    John Quincy Adams: “America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.”

    What we have is a presidential impersonator, who has ordered wars on foreign nations on behalf of the USA, the American people – none of which he has any lawful authority to do. He has no lawful authority to pretend he is the Commander in Chief because the congress has NOT declared war. Very little of what Obama has done is lawful or authorized by the US Constitution which lists all authority that the OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES has, not any person who served within it.

    We do not have a government here in the USA, because the only type of government authorized is our Constitutional Republic. Dr. Vieira says it best: ““This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides…

    The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights… The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights.

    The reason for that is: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS THAT SET OF ACTIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CONSTITUTION. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.” (caps mine)

    What we have and have allowed to continue is Election Fraud putting people into places of authority here in our nation. Then we have allowed them to murder others in our name while also murdering our family members as a “military” that is not authorized because the conditions must be met to have a military.

    What we have is agencies who have NO authority to do so, making laws that are being enforced though that is breaking the Oath and *Terrorism on the part of the enforcers – Stop it before you allow yourself to be made into a *terrorist, or traitor to our nation by “just following orders” and “just doing your job”.

    What we also have is every single person who is serving in the Pentagon, the executive branch, the legislative branch, the judicial branch are working against the USA, the American people, every soldier that follows those orders given to them instead of keeping the Oath as is required of them – Stop it. You (generic “you”) supposedly enlisted or got into the position you occupy to defend your country, and its legitimate government, to strengthen it. Your government is the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution NOT the people who SERVE WITHIN IT whatever position they occupy as they are there to carry out specific put-into-writing duties, and in a constitutional manner. How can you support and defend her ((USA) if you do not even KNOW what our government is and what is allowed to be done by those that serve in any and every position within government?

    Basically we just have another act of TREASON on the part of ALL involved – yes techies, that does mean you. Anyone who negotiated this, copied the paperwork in this and other actions, etc. YOU are all responsible for YOUR actions in destroying our nation. You are required to say “NO”!

    Cicero, 55 BC: “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

    He may “give it away” but it is stolen goods as it does NOT belong to him (Obama)nor was that position where he is IMPERSONATING a US President ever authorized to do such a thing. It is just another act of treason against the American people.

    Alexander Hamilton, defending the new Constitution, and especially its Treaty Clause: “I aver, that it was understood by all to be the intent of the provision [the Treaty Clause] to give to that power the most ample latitude to render it competent to all the stipulations, which the exigencies of National Affairs might require—competent to the making of Treaties of Alliance, Treaties of Commerce, Treaties of Peace and every other species of Convention usual among nations and competent in the course of its exercise to controul & bind the legislative power of Congress. And it was emphatically for this reason that it was so carefully guarded; the cooperation of two thirds of the Senate with the President being required to make a Treaty. I appeal for this with confidence.”
    He went further: “It will not be disputed that the words ‘Treaties and alliances’ are of equivalent import and of no greater force than the single word Treaties. An alliance is only a species of Treaty, a particular of a general. And the power of ‘entering into Treaties,’ which terms confer the authority under which the former Government acted, will not be pretended to be stronger than the power ‘to make Treaties,’ which are the terms constituting the authority under which the present Government acts.”

    Patrick Henry: “When government removes your armaments, you will have NO power but government will have ALL power! What will you do when evil men take office?”
    Patrick Henry: “When evil men take office, the whole gang will be in collusion. They will keep the people in utter ignorance and steal their liberty by ambuscade.“
    Patrick Henry: “A standing army we shall have, also to execute the execrable commands of tyranny.”
    Patrick Henry: “The power of the federal courts would swell the patronage of the president.
    Patrick Henry: “The president will lead in the treason…”

    Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 33: “…If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard [THE CONSTITUTION] they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify….” (caps mine)

    Thomas Jefferson: “When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”

    Patrick Henry, American colonial revolutionary: “The liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be, secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them.”

    Notice that this all starts with election fraud and “police” powers that go against the US Constitution, unlawful wars. WE have allowed them to destroy our nation. WE must fix it, but we must do it constitutionally or we also will have worked to destroy our nation as they plan for us to do. They push for us to fight, they murdered Levoy, and many others for those reasons. All our steps must be lawful. The Militia is authorized by the US Constitution, but a permanent military is NOT, nor is federal and state police forces. Sheriffs are by way of history, but even here their actions in order to be lawful MUST be constitutional.

    The Constitution requires that ALL criminals get a day in court (another reason assassination is treason and *terrorism) and that includes traitors. Charges must be brought, and judges that know and follow the US Constitution used. The Grand Jury and Grand Jury Investigations are NOT the tools of those that serve within our governments, they are the PEOPLE’s tool to be used when needed or wanted.

    God Bless and Stay Safe All

    Cal
    If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

    Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

    Reply this comment
  6. John Ryan 30 September, 2016, 09:51

    http://www.bucksafa11.org/2016/09/29/conspiracy-of-the-corrupt-2/

    hasta lumbagels maybe.

    The plus side is we get to talk face to face. You never know what that leads to, do ya?

    Reply this comment
  7. Stewart Rhodes 30 September, 2016, 10:52

    Thanks for posting this Elias. Folks, you need to have “alternate” lines of communication, networking, and coordination for just this reason. It is something we are working on within Oath Keepers, as an org, but it something you need to do too, in your own community and your own networks among friends and allies. Don’t count on the internet.

    Reply this comment
  8. Greg K 1 October, 2016, 09:01

    Watch the movie, “The Postman.”
    May I be so bold as to suggest we start getting off the Corporacracy/ Government Controlled currency system as well? Barter, Barter, Barter!

    Reply this comment
    • Frank 4 October, 2016, 11:44

      Thank you, Elias, Stewart and Cal for posting this, and for suggested needed actions. I wrote my congressman (state of NE) Friday after reading this post, and here’s his reply:
      “Because of the importance of this issue, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114-113) prohibited the Department of Commerce from relinquishing control of these functions. This prohibition was extended through December 9, 2016, by the Continuing Appropriations and Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017 and Zika Response and Preparedness Act, which was signed into law on September 9, 2016.
      “Because the Department of Commerce has taken actions which suggest it will violate this prohibition, I joined 85 of my colleagues in writing a letter to U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker urging the administration to sign a new contract and to not go through with this internet transition. ”

      Your points have more meaning for me than this joint congressional “action.”

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*