‘Religious Leader’ Bears False Witness against Oath Keepers

ScreenHunter_05 Sep. 03 18.04

In typical “progressive” Opposite Day fashion, “Reverend” Wilson, with access to the Huffington Post megaphone, is hardly silenced, and uses her bully pulpit to spread what she has marked on her face—hate, against those who do not share her fanatical collectivist dogma. – Twitter profile photo.

“The militarization of police such as in Ferguson, the massive arming of citizens, and new generations of militia such as the ‘Oath Keepers,’ merge with centuries of racism rooted in slavery and enforced by policing, housing discrimination, segregation, income inequality, and voter disempowerment brings us to this moment in history unlike any we have seen in 50 years,” a collectivist identifying herself as “Rev. Dr. Nancy Wilson, Global Leader, Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC),” writes on the “progressive” Huffington Post.

“Americans are locked and loaded. In Ferguson, predominantly White ‘Oath Keepers’ walk fully armed with automatic weapons and munitions in the streets, and say they just want to defend the Constitution,” Wilson continues. “Their website makes a point to say that military officer Oath Keepers do not pledge to obey the President of the United States.”

Where do we begin with such nonsense?

How about, since she makes a point of referencing the Oath Keepers website, we assume she actually spent some time doing what responsible writers do, that is, researching her subject matter so she can at least be accurate, if not authoritative.

As for her first attempt at conflation, Oath Keepers has been at the forefront of warning against police militarization and the threat to liberty that poses. As Oath Keeper Ed Wilson noted relating his conversation with founder Stewart Rhodes, “[W]e firmly oppose the current morph from community policing to federally militarized and federally subsidized abduction of the people’s local protection.”

Then there’s Wilson’s “militia such as the ‘Oath Keepers” charge. Editor Elias Alias addressed that media-fueled misconception:

The reason Oath Keepers is not a Militia is simple — among other considerations, we do not have a command structure, do not assign Militia rank designations or titles, and we are not a division of any State Militia Office, since to the best of my knowledge those no longer exist in modern America. Oath Keepers loves the name “Militia”, but Oath Keepers is not a Militia. We would, however, love to see every State have its Office of the Militia, for we do honor out Oath to the Constitution which requires the Militia. Why else would the SPLC and DHS hate our guts, eh?

Next, Wilson attempts to play the race card, either  oblivious or not caring that Oath Keepers is a champion of civil as well as natural rights. The Bylaws make it clear:

No person who advocates, or has been or is a member, or associated with, any organization, formal or informal, that advocates discrimination, violence, or hatred toward any person based upon their race, nationality, creed, or color, shall be entitled to be a member or associate member.

As for Oath Keepers “walk[ing[ fully armed with automatic weapons,”  Wilson shows the typical ignorance and bigotry of those who demand more anti-gun edicts while being clueless about existing Intolerable Acts. She’s playing right into the hands of the Violence Policy Center, which as far back as 1988 laid out the deceptive game plan:

The weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons.

As for not taking an oath to obey the president, Wilson, who like a good national socialist prefers a loyalty pledge that mimics the one imposed by you-know-who, commits several sins of omission by not explaining the Oath Keepers position:

Current Serving and Veterans, you swore an Oath…

Military Enlisted Oath I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

Military Officers Oath I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God

NOTE: While the enlisted oath does contain a pledge to obey the orders of the President and of commanding officers, that is still preceded by a pledge to “defend the Constitution,” and is also qualified by the requirement that such orders be “according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” Any order, by anyone, that is not constitutional or according to regulations, is unlawful and military personnel are not obligated to follow such orders – and, in fact, are obligated to refuse.

In other words, “I was just following orders” is not an excuse for committing crimes under color of authority, and Wilson objects to that?

That’s hardly a surprise for those of us who have come to understand that for “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day. It explains why, rather than embracing the true power sharing made possible with the right of the people to keep and bear arms, fake egalitarian Wilson instead advocates for a state monopoly of violence and the totalitarianism, mass human enslavement, suffering, misery and death that enables.

That’s some ‘reverend.” It does make it fair to wonder the nature of the “god” she serves.

About Author

David Codrea

David Codrea blogs at The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance (WarOnGuns.com), and is a field editor/columnist for GUNS Magazine. Named “Journalist of the Year” in 2011 by the Second Amendment Foundation for his groundbreaking work on the “Fast and Furious” ATF “gunwalking” scandal, he is a frequent event speaker and guest on national radio and television programs.

Comments

  1. Hawaiian 4 September, 2015, 21:11

    For sure she doesn’t do her homework before speaking. She should be charged with slander. West Coast Member.

    Reply this comment
  2. MJHerren 4 September, 2015, 21:17

    Mocking GOD is a Wish To Spend Eternity in HELL. Be what you want on Earth, but do not FORCE it on anyone else. If a Nonbeliever thinks that he is Right — Look for Bad Times ahead.

    Reply this comment
    • OVERTAXED 6 September, 2015, 15:46

      Sadly: That’s not a “HE”, that is a androgynous “SHE~HE” that obviously wishes to intentionally appear as a “gender-neutral”.

      Reply this comment
  3. D. Bertrand 5 September, 2015, 01:08

    Secret FEMA Plan To Use Pastors as Pacifiers in Preparation For Martial Law
    Nationwide initiative trains volunteers to teach congregations to “obey the government” during seizure of guns, property, forced inoculations and forced relocation

    Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | May 24 2006

    A Pastor has come forward to blow the whistle on a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to “obey the government” in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation.

    In March of this year the Pastor, who we shall refer to as Pastor Revere, was invited to attend a meeting of his local FEMA chapter which circulated around preparedness for a potential bio-terrorist attack, any natural disaster or a nationally declared emergency.

    The FEMA directors told the Pastors that attended that it was their job to help implement FEMA and Homeland Security directives in anticipation of any of these eventualities. The first directive was for Pastors to preach to their congregations Romans 13, the often taken out of context bible passage that was used by Hitler to hoodwink Christians into supporting him, in order to teach them to “obey the government” when martial law is declared.

    It was related to the Pastors that quarantines, martial law and forced relocation were a problem for state authorities when enforcing federal mandates due to the “cowboy mentality” of citizens standing up for their property and second amendment rights as well as farmers defending their crops and livestock from seizure. It was stressed that the Pastors needed to preach subservience to the authorities ahead of time in preparation for the round-ups and to make it clear to the congregation that “this is for their own good.”

    We have received confirmation from other preachers and Pastors that this program is a nationwide initiative and a literal Soviet model whereby the churches are being systematically infiltrated by government volunteers and used as conduits for martial law training and conditioning. The Pastor was told that over 1,300 counties were already on board.

    It falls under the umbrella of the NVOAD program which is training volunteers in a “Peer to Peer” program in a neighborhood setting.

    Pastors were told that the would be backed up by law enforcement in controlling uncooperative individuals and that they would even lead SWAT teams in attempting to quell resistance

    Reply this comment
  4. OPFORjim 5 September, 2015, 07:01

    Sad , someone who owes their tax-free, non-contributing status to the blood of our forefathers and the Constitution’s First Amendment (free exercise of religion)… would deny the “other” rights of fellow citizens.

    This is the very definition of a hypocrite… “Do as I say, not as I do”. Your Jesus HATED the Pharisees and Hypocrites (Both religious cults).

    Matthew 10:34 “”I came not to bring peace, but to bring a sword”” – Jesus

    Thankfully , the 1st Amendment, curtails her unlawful desires to create “any law respecting an establishment of religion”. And the 2nd Amendment protecting, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms”, to enforce the 1s Amendment. Freedom of religion, is freedom from religion.

    The 1st also protects my opinion that you’re a phony cult (Founded in 1968 ?!?) sponsored by the “Illuminati”. Come back when you have survived 224 years, like our Constitution.

    I have nothing against religion, but remember, your tax-free status is revocable for playing politics. Keep your God in the church, and out of my secular life. The origin of the Judeo-Christian faith is one of slavery (Egypt). I am not your slave.

    “The Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”
    ~1797 Treaty of Tripoli signed by Founding Father John Adams

    Reply this comment
    • Abnpreacher 7 September, 2015, 16:15

      OPFORJim, as an Oath Keeper you need to study the Constitution and laws of our land better before spewing falsehoods. First, Christianity, from the very beginning of our Country was allowed in the government and public circles. It was never suppressed to the church house alone. Our founding fathers prayed before their meetings for wisdom in leading this Country and in establishing it correctly. Second, there is NO law that can take tax-exemption from a church for stating their political preferences and beliefs. Why? Because a church is automatically tax-immune according to the laws of the land. What is the difference? One is granted by the government (exemption) the other (immunity) is automatic and cannot be refused or revoked. The majority of our founding father were, by their own admissions, Christians. Most of the people that first came to America a came for one reason – Religious Liberty. A Baptist Pastor from Virginia, John Leland, was the person that first pushed for and was the reason James Madison brought forward the Bill of Rights. Do NOT try to force me to hide my faith in the church house! That is not what the Oath Keepers are about.

      Reply this comment
  5. bobmaccian 5 September, 2015, 08:36

    shes just another boot licking troll for the obamination of america

    Reply this comment
  6. Oosik 5 September, 2015, 13:30

    Female “minister ” is an un-Christian joke to start with. This lesbian is an infiltrator, a liberal propagandist, and should get zero respect and visibility.

    Reply this comment
  7. Ned 5 September, 2015, 17:02

    It’s too bad – but not shocking – that a “progressive Christian” minister (if that’s what she is) reads what she wants to see into any rational discourse regarding obeying gubmint.

    Used to be, gay men and lesbian females understood that what they got as “love” from government agents was lip-service. Now the homosexual threepers have discovered a way to take control and expand their ranks. And it has nothing to do with freedom, but control.

    When they discover they’ve been used, as have many others , as useful idiots, it will be too late.

    Reply this comment
  8. Stormin1 6 September, 2015, 01:48

    I wish the term ‘genocide’ had been used in the second to last paragraph.. It is practically impossible to have genocide without central government.

    Reply this comment
  9. Dave 6 September, 2015, 05:00

    Can a woman, or any LGBTQ serve God? I think not! They are there for political purposes, and therefore they serve themselves! The churches that have let these heretics in, are the ones hitting bottom first! The episcopal church is a good example! Once they give themselves over, the agenda is all about immoral liberal causes: gay rights, woman’s right to choose, immigration, guns, global warming, and the Bible becomes like the Constitution to them! It’s just a document to work around! And they then spend all their time trying to explain it away!

    These people live without moral law! They live in sin, and revel in it! And, like sodom and gamorrah, they want to force you to live in it too!

    Now America gives God the boot and fly rainbows! The next few months may be interesting!

    Reply this comment
  10. The Legend 6 September, 2015, 23:54

    Just one more liberal moron spouting lies and division. We’ve seen enough of these so called “reverends” with their holier than thou attitude from Jim Jones to those idiots protesting funerals of our fallen service personnel. Judgement begins at the pulpit, our Heavenly Father with deal with them in due time!!!

    Reply this comment
  11. highflight 7 September, 2015, 02:16

    The days are soon approaching with those of her cloth being the armed tyrannical sheeple who blindly get in step loading YOU onto the trains… This is not a time for sleep, nor a time to simply remark in passing, These people are dead serious. We see the life threats at Kim Davis and those who have refused to bake a cake. If YOU were to make a death threat at any who promote the progressive advocates would you not be jailed?

    First they think it, then they say it, then they do it. The evilness they express is in their desire to literally see YOU drawn and quartered. Maybe some real constitutional sheriffs will start arresting, jailing, and throwing away the key; otherwise we invest in miles of rope, sending a very real message in response.

    MOLON LABE

    Reply this comment
  12. InalienableWrights 7 September, 2015, 15:52

    Do not try and fathom the libtard brain, I don’t think that it is possible.

    Reply this comment
  13. Abnpreacher 7 September, 2015, 16:00

    As a pastor and a Christian I can say on authority of the Word of God that this woman is NOT a minister of God and His Word. First, because the Bible says that the office of a Bishop (i.e. Pastor) is to be held by “the husband of one wife” (I Timothy 3:2). It is hard to be a woman and the “husband of one wife”. Second, God’s Word is firmly in support of liberty, self-defense, and laws that are made to defend the rights of the people and to ensure equality and order. God bless the Oath Keepers! – Liberty Tree Member

    Reply this comment
  14. AL 7 September, 2015, 16:03

    All by design, purpose and government sponsored there are so many of these types!

    Reply this comment
  15. DebVet 7 September, 2015, 16:04

    If you had done your homework you would know that State Militia is REQUIRED in the Constitution! And not just in the Second Amendment! This has been totally ignored by both the States and Congress in recent years. Thus, the need for the Oath Keepers. As a female vet I am very offended by the slanderous remarks made against this fine organization that I joined to continue supporting the oath I took at the tender age of 18. MOLON LABE!

    Reply this comment
  16. rgeebee 7 September, 2015, 16:04

    I am a born again Spirit Filled Christian. There is ONLY ONE GOD – the Father of All spirits – and the Father who sent His only begotten Son to die for each of US. HE is also our Creator and HE gave our Founders the revelation that our natural rights (some of which are articulated in our Bill of Rights) come from HIM, not from puny self serving men who can then take them away. These are the rights we stand firmly for and will continue to stand in spite of false “believers” and their humanistic degenerate nwo positions. I am also a VET. I took that oath of enlistment when I was drafted into the US Army during the Vietnam War. That OATH HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE. Great article. So glad to be part of Oath Keepers!

    Reply this comment
  17. Bridger 7 September, 2015, 16:08

    First, it is God is whom we answer to in relation to Devine Law, The declaration of Independence, Federalist papers, U.S. Constitution to the Bill of Rights. All said mentioned are one body. Over time, our leaders have cut by cut taken the head off the body (The U.S. Constitution) and set it aside and created a “Secular Document.” Think about that for a moment. the same concept applies to the individual today: they are coming for our heads. If we understand, before we came to earth, we agreed in the preexistence we are the ones chosen to fight the ‘BEAST.” We are watching the divisions and fruition coming to pass. This is no surprise if we dig deep into our souls. We know intuitively the truth, and what our mission is. The good thing is we know who our opposition is. Godspeed, faith, hope, traction and pass the ammo for all of us individually to stay the course.

    Reply this comment
  18. Tim 7 September, 2015, 16:10

    First and foremost, Matthew 23:8-12 says, “But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all students. And call no one your father on earth, for you have one Father—the one in heaven. Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Messiah. The greatest among you will be your servant. All who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.” So, according to Christ, she has no authority to instruct or spiritually lead anyone.

    Second, refer to #1.

    Reply this comment
  19. Chip 7 September, 2015, 16:12

    Welcome to the Chastisement brothers and sisters…https://shutupnsing.wordpress.com/2015/09/06/the-sunday-morning-tune-up-september-6-2015/ …where Truth is a fugitive.

    Reply this comment
  20. ALAN 7 September, 2015, 16:33

    sounds a lot like the days of NOAH., , BUT WHAT WHAT DO I KNOW, I AM JUST. ONE OF THOSE FANATIC CHRISTIANS WITH A WEAPON.AND THE SWORD OF JESUS. AMEN

    Reply this comment
  21. TYGER 7 September, 2015, 17:25

    FIRST OF ALL WE DON’T OBEY AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL PRESIDENT. PERIOD. HE NEEDS TO BE REMOVED.

    Reply this comment
  22. Bklyn_40 7 September, 2015, 17:25

    After the police in Ferguson, and then those in Baltimore, let animals destroy the city and injure innocent people, you’re damn right “Americans are locked and loaded.”
    But this “Reverend” missed the point. It is AMERICANS that are lock and loaded. Not Whites, Not Blacks, and so on, but Americans who are sick of all the violence in the disguise of protest.
    Our Oath, the Oath of the Police and the Oath of our Military do not pledge to obey the President of the United States. These Oaths all are to defend the Constitution. If we pledge to the POTUS, what a damn mess our country would be in because that IDIOT has attacked our Constitution and still tries to abolish it.

    Reply this comment
  23. fl4guy 7 September, 2015, 17:44

    My oath is to the United States Constitution, NOT the President.

    Reply this comment
    • zione 7 September, 2015, 18:59

      The “PRESIDE”nts job is to keep us safe & PRESIDE over the Constitution.The PRESIDEnt also takes the oath,thus HE is also an “OATHKEEPER”

      Reply this comment
      • Shorty Dawkins 7 September, 2015, 20:22

        The President takes the Oath of Office. Therefore he/she is an Oath Taker, whether he/she is an Oath Keeper depends on his/her actions in office.

        Shorty Dawkins

        Reply this comment
      • Cal 8 September, 2015, 13:28

        “The “PRESIDE”nts job is to keep us safe & PRESIDE over the Constitution”

        The US President position is located within the “EXECUTIVE” branch, from which his authority, and those that are there to “ASSIST” him carry out his duties is to “EXECUTE” the laws of the land which are in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution.

        Here is the list:

        Article 2, Section 1: “he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

        Hmm, no where here within the required Oath does it say that he is responsible for the safety of the people, only to “PRESERVE (which he isn’t, but then neither did the last 4 people serving as US Presidents), PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

        Article 2, Section 2: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES; (Not here either)

        he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. (Nor here)

        He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.
        The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session. It is also not found here.)

        Section 3: “He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States. (Nor is that duty found here.)

        Article 4, Section 4: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.” (Would you think that since the listed and put-into-writing duty of the general (fedearl) government is to “protect each of them against Invasion”, and they have not, then it is not only Treason, but for every injury, murder, property destroyed, etc that each serving within the general government required by Oath to make it their PERSONAL duty to carry out the US Constitution is also PERSONALLY responsible for every one of those things carried out against the American person? That we can take every item, bank account, etc and sell them to make reparation for those injured/killed by those that serve in ANY position within the general government for refusing to keep their Oath and to do their duty that IS put into writing?

        Oh, and did you notice that the duty to create any law that is binding on the American people is also NOT a duty of anyone who serves within the executive branch? NOR is the buying, selling, or land management, or giving/selling/trading/loaning/etc of ANY US military armament of any kind under their jurisdiction.

        So every military item that has been given to foreign nations, foreign entities, foreign terrorists/rebels, or to any US law enforcement agency, or to anyone whatsoever is THEFT of military equipment. The US Constitution does address where those items are LAWFULLY required to go here in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16: “To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress”.

        Remember that those who serve within our governments – state and general are REQUIRED to use the Militias of the several states and THAT is also put into writing within the US Constitution.

        Reply this comment
  24. Dr. Clifford N. Alford 7 September, 2015, 18:26

    With such an obvious lack of intelligence and understanding I can only assume that she got her ordination and doctorate from a second rate diploma mill like the Universal Life Church. Those of us who have real educations tend to value the freedoms that made it possible to earn them. A real education generally results in the development of a fair degree of discernment. She will likely develop some discernment too late when some gang bangers take over her neighborhood, her home and her body. Then she will pray for someone like a reasonably armed Oath Keeper to come along and save her, and her god will laugh and say, “No, you can’t have any of that kind of help after the things that you said about them before! Call FEMA instead”,

    Reply this comment
  25. Chaplain Ed 7 September, 2015, 18:29

    MCC is a liberal, mostly gay organization that be lives if you tell the same lie often enough, it becomes true. I wouldn’T waste my time or breath on it. I was taught never to argue with a fool. People standing back watching usually can’T tell the difference.

    God bless the USA!
    Bishop Ed Skiba, Florida OK Chaplain

    Reply this comment
    • Debra 8 September, 2015, 02:09

      Nancy Wilson has a “wife” of 30 years. This speaks VOLUMES to me about the God she serves and it is NOT THE LIVING GOD OF THE BIBLE.
      Bishop Ed, I am in agreement with you regarding engagement with fools in discussion…..it is a waste of good oxygen.

      BUT~ these ungodly fools will prevail if good Christians don’t start standing up for their God ~ HE is watching ~

      Reply this comment
  26. JeffH 7 September, 2015, 18:29

    What a great rebuttal and full rejection by David Codrea to the progressive gamesmanship played by the faux RINO(reverand in name only). Succinct and to the point.

    Thank you OathKeepers for being who and what you are…duly sworn protectors of the Constitution.

    Reply this comment
  27. Gunny 7 September, 2015, 18:36

    I think these bible thumpers should keep their opinions to them selves I am an American and a retied Marine with 30 years of service and I AM armed to protect the constitution I fly my flags to let others know where I stand and im proud to stand against these people who are so very high and mighty and think they can point the rest of us the ways they think we should go in their opinion nuff said Semper Fi

    Reply this comment
    • Debra 8 September, 2015, 02:17

      Gunny~ Please don’t confuse sincere Christians with a heretic such as Nancy Wilson. I am a retired LEO and I also love my country, my God, my Constitution, my beautiful flag and my guns!!!!! Nancy Wilson has a wife of 30 years. This is sin. God will not be mocked! She throws her sin in God’s face and He will NOT forget, nor will He fail (out of love for her possible eternal salvation) to judge and punish because HE IS SOVEREIGN. Thank you for your service, Sir!

      Reply this comment
  28. Vinny 7 September, 2015, 18:38

    To begin with, who exactly is this “Dr” that is a professed ” Global Leader” ? Obviously self appointed and obviously severely confused and obviously has an ingrained hatred towards men and all patriots in general as demonstrated by “her” rant to the Huffington Post. Secondly, our O. K. Bylaws are quite clear and open for examination by one and all. I would of never become a member if Oath keepers supported and represented this “Global Leaders” slanderous statement and allegations. When I raised my hand and recited my Oath in 1954 it did not have an expiration date attached. As incorrect and slanderous as :”her” statement is, there is an old quote that is used when playing cards….”a card laid is a card played” ……which simply means that those that read and share her venomous attitude will take a dim view of our organization, purpose and goals even though they were incorrectly stated by this self appointed “Global leader”……I feel “she” is only serving the agendas and likes of Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky and the current Administration, hence, “Global Communism”…….it will continue to ring in my ears…..”no adversary, foreign or domestic” !!

    Reply this comment
  29. RSSJR 7 September, 2015, 18:42

    The Bible says clearly…..women shall not be preachers.
    This woman probably is lesbian as well.
    But what part of “shall not preach” is so hard to understand?
    Jerk her out from behind the pulpit and send her packing

    Reply this comment
  30. Dino 7 September, 2015, 19:38

    What else would a Bought and Paid for Whore for the New World Order Say actively attempting to Overthrow these United States providing aide and comfort to a known Proven Criminal Fraud USURPER with lies Propaganda stwisting and perversion of History and the Truth to pursue a Treasonous Agenda that they need to be IMMEDIATELY Mass Arrested….and everyone that took and Oath to Protect and Defend have been bought and paid for as well including Congress the Senate and our Entire National Security Apperattus…. They all know Obama is a FRAUD and does nothing to remove him…. That is called Mis Prison of Treason! That makes them all FELONS and can be Mass Arrested by the Citizenary if they would wake up and realize they have the power to do it! Everything they have done since 2008 is Null and VOID as well as everything that has been done since the Illegal Creation of the USA CORPORATION and the illegally Re Written Constitution 1871 by King George and his whores in the 41st Congress without the knowledge and Consent of the American People!

    Article 1 Section 7 Clause 2 ……………. Of the Constitution ….. The Origional 1776 Pennsylvania Constitution of our ForeFathers….NOT….. the Illegally created and re written USA CORPORATION Constitution 1871 created illegally and forced upon the people without their knowledge and consent by King George and his whores in the 41st Congress. Article 1 Section 7 Clause 2 was deliberately re written because the New World Order Left does not want you to know these things and here below is the origional:

    No laws of Congress are valid

    “Congress can pass no law while a usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President. ”The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States ” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper, (Which he did with the Criminal Assistance of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed and the DNC and others already proven just being Criminally ignored) will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.””

    Furthermore, Obama Could not be Removed Except by Force. As a USURPER posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach Obama because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the States and the people. (This must happen there is no other way)

    ALSO, Bear in mind, that as an imposter Commander–in-Chief of the Armed Forces, “he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those Armed forces and Law Enforcment. Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders” including law enforcement will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme circumstances even charged with “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch of the General Government (s) will be required to put into effect any of Obama’s purported “proclamations,” “executive orders,” or “directives” (Viera, J.).

    The Constitution weather they chose to ignore it “is the Supreme Law of this Land” and they are BOUND to it Article 6 Section 3 and are all FORBIDDEN to “warring Against it”….all they do is NULL and VOID not to mention they have been Criminally DeFacto since 1871! Everything that has been done since 2008 is also NULL and VOID as well as everything that has been done since 1871! Because it, the installation of their Criminal USA CORPORATION, the Criminal and Deliberate re writing of our Constitution, and the selling of our Birth Cirtificates on the Open Stock Market was done Deliberately, Criminally to Deceive and Defraud the American People and FORCE THEM into a British & Vatican, Illuminati Controlled Debt Fraud Slavery (Maritine) System wthout the KNOWLEDGE and without the CONSENT of the American People…..2 things required to make any contract legally binding! It was an act of High Treason and they had no Legal Lawful or Constitutional power to do anything they did……its NULL and VOID and EVERYTHING they have done to advance their Criminal Satanic Nazi New World Order since 1871 (which are also Criminally Subversive Open Acts of High Treason) behind the backs of the American People ie., the passing of Laws, Bills, Amendments, Executive Orders, Mandates, and Treaties are also NULL AND VOID! Hence, the Origional 1776 Constitution of our Fore Fathers is STILL LEGALLY IN PLAY and very much alive!
    What this Criminally DeFacto Tyranical Government is keeping from you…..
    http://djosiris.blogspot.com/2011/09/in-1871-united-states-constitution-was.html

    The Crown Temple……. Secret Society of the Third Way Order
    https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/EM2-WS-004-01=THE+CROWN+TEMPLE..pdf

    Just because they wish to ignore the Constitution in order to advance a Seditious Subversive and Treasonous NWO Agenda against the very Nation and People they Swore to Protect and Defend does not DISAPEAR the Constitution…… The Constitution has always been there and weather they wish to acknowledge it or not are all still very much BOUND TO IT! They are all Psychotically Criminally Insane and need to be Arrested and removed immediately by our Military. By their own Criminal Hands and by their Ciminal Actions alone since 1871 they have NULL and VOIDED everything they have done!
    THE U.S. MILITARY DOES HAVE LEGAL JURISDICTION TO ARREST OBAMA!
    http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/…/the-u-s…/

    Citizens Mass Arrest
    http://www.theeventchronicle.com/editors-pick/citizens-mass-arrest-of-the-cabal-notice-public-order-april-3-2015-issued-by-judge-anna-von-reitz/

    How we were defrauded……….detailed timeline!
    http://scannedretina.com/2015/04/01/the-specific-details-of-how-you-were-defrauded-by-judge-anna-von-reitz-alaska/

    Source Documents
    http://anticorruptionsociety.com/source-documents/

    Judge Anne Von Reitz Blows the lid off of the Great Fraud
    http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/04/judge-blows-the-lid-off-the-great-fraud-3132632.html?currentSplittedPage=2
    Understanding the Corruption in the Courts
    http://commonlawpower.com/understanding-corruption.htm

    Reply this comment
  31. photoguy 7 September, 2015, 19:49

    As a Vietnam Veteran and strong supporter of civil rights for all people of color including white (which the last time I looked was also a color), it should be known that I am a card carrying member of the Oath Keepers organization. I would like to say to the Rev. Dr. Nancy Wilson that years ago I sat on a ‘Freedom
    Bus’ oposing the racial intolerance of my black brothers and fellow airman, two of which later perished
    fighting for her to have the right to speak openly in America today.
    Ms. Wilson’s ignorance of today’s reality fans the flame of America’s race problem today. As it was said
    years ago shortly after the killing of the 35th President, “America would not know a ‘bad guy’ unless he
    walked down the street wearing a sixgun and a black hat” . I would respectfully ask the good Rev. Dr.
    Wilson to return to the classroom and revisit history, and while doing so, learn who the good guys really are…. I for one, am on that team with Oath Keepers

    Reply this comment
  32. Destry 7 September, 2015, 20:12

    Is she Christian spewing all that hate ! I swore an Oath to support and defend the Constitution, a document based upon the teachings of the Bible.

    Reply this comment
  33. Billy Byrd 7 September, 2015, 20:45

    She is living in a liberal dream world, black people commit more crimes, sorry but it’s true. Funny how a bunch of old guys with ARs can put a damper on robbing and pillaging festivities. I’m a business owner, started from nothing and no animals are getting a free lunch as long as I can breath.

    Reply this comment
  34. 5WarVeteran 7 September, 2015, 22:36

    When I see the combination of “Reverend” and “Doctor” together. All I can think is more than the average manipulation from a single individual…

    “Rev. Dr. Nancy Wilson, Global Leader, Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC),”

    The more the “honorifics” the greater the EGO and the more I see sociopathetic manipulation from an egotistical elite scumbag.

    No, really, I do feel this way….

    Reply this comment
    • Obbop 7 September, 2015, 23:45

      I agree with your statement. Experience has taught me that you are very accurate with your observation.

      Reply this comment
  35. Calvin John 7 September, 2015, 22:38

    The Rev. Wilson’s inaccurate potshots at armed Oath Keepers in Ferguson are serious. But I have an even greater concern:
    She is the Moderator of the Metropolitan Community Churches, a homosexual denomination. As such, she can lend her weight to arouse the homosexual community against any group (like Oath Keepers) that can credibly challenge SCOTUS’s constitutionally absurd mandate of same sex marriage. Whether or not that’s on her mind, if she and others can stir up lies against us, people are less likely to listen should (WHEN??!!) we go public with the following points:
    1) The Constitution nowhere delegates the Feds any power to define marriage (Article 1, Section 8 and the 10th Amendment);
    2) Even if it did, it is for Congress, not the Courts, to do it (Article 1, Section 1).
    3) Amendments to the Constitution have contained no enforcement powers in themselves; the texts of the amendments consistently delegated that responsibility to Congress (13th, 14th, 15th, 19th, 23rd, 24th, and 26th Amendments). Why does a decision by 5 unelected judges not need an Act of Congress to enforce it? Why is a Kentucky County Clerk in jail when she broke no law?
    4) In light of the above, why aren’t we rattling the cages of our governors, attorneys general, and State reps until they defy this Constitutional monstrosity and tell the inevitable Federal judges who oppose them to pound sand?

    Rev. Wilson (and many others) will also claim that County Clerk Kim Davis “broke the law” by refusing same sex marriage licenses. That’s not true! She broke no Federal or State law; she is in jail BECAUSE she kept her Oath to the U.S. Constitution AND to the Kentucky Constitution, which was amended in 2004 by a ¾ majority to deny same sex marriage. It was a rebellious Federal Judge who joined SCOTUS’s rebellion who put her in jail for not joining in his rebellion. She’s in “contempt of court” when that court has no Constitutional jurisdiction.
    Shame on anyone else who is NOT in contempt of such a court!
    Rev. Wilson is a wicked woman, denying key tenets of the 1000 year old Christian faith in which she leads a rogue denomination. I doubt she’s stupid, ignorantly mangling the facts of the Ferguson story. I suspect she’s being very clever, trying to blunt our effectiveness in a battle that is VERY much her and her constituents’ agenda before we even jump into it – if we ever do.

    Reply this comment
    • Cal 8 September, 2015, 14:10

      “… credibly challenge SCOTUS’s constitutionally absurd mandate of same sex marriage”

      No, what must happen is “We…” must create our own CONSTITUTIONALLY LAWFUL Grand Jury investigation and put all the evidence together on their unlawful use of foreign laws, etc to create an opinion that some ignorant believe is law, and remove the judges for NOT using the constitutionally required “Good Behaviour”. And it is “We the People…” who must remove them.

      US Constitution, Article III, Section 1: “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.”

      The US Constitution defines “Good Behaviour” for judges in its requirements for them and assigned duties. The US Constitution assigns what all judges, state and federal, must do to be allowed to stay in a judicial position, they are:
      — Required to take, and keep an Oath(s), or a combined Oath.
      — Required to “support and defend” the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it before the duties of the office they occupy.
      — Required to carry out the enumerated duties assigned to the judicial branch by the US Constitution in a constitutional manner.

      That is “Good Behaviour” for judges, and it is a short list.

      Off topic, but you might want to consider these words from the framers regarding our republican form of government.

      James Madison, Federalist, no. 39, 250-53: “If we resort for a criterion, to the different principles on which different forms of government are established, we may define a republic to be, or at least may bestow that name on, a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people; and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure, for a limited period, or during good behaviour. It is essential to such a government, that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion, or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans, and claim for their government the honorable title of republic.”

      Madison again: “The supreme power therefore can do nothing but what is for the good of the whole; and when it goes beyond this line, it is a power usurped. If the individual receives an equivalent for the right of controul he has parted with, the surrender of that right is valid; if he receives no equivalent, the surrender is void, and the supreme power as it respects him is an usurper. If the supreme power is so directed and executed that he does not enjoy political liberty, it is an illegal power, and he is not bound to obey. Political liberty is by some defined, a liberty of doing whatever is not prohibited by law. The definition is erroneous. A tyrant may govern by laws. The republic’s of Venice and Holland govern by laws, yet those republic’s have degenerated into insupportable tyrannies. Let it be thus defined; political liberty is the right every man in the state has, to do whatever is not prohibited by laws, TO WHICH HE HAS GIVEN HIS CONSENT. This definition is in unison with the feelings of a free people. But to return–If a fundamental principle on which each individual enters into society is, that he shall be bound by no laws but those to which he has consented, he cannot be considered as consenting to any law enacted by a minority;”

      And Madison, the Father of the US Constitution again “Before we proceed further, it must be again considered, and kept always in view, that we are not attempting to form a temporary constitution, one adjusted only to our present circumstances. We wish for one founded upon such principles as will secure to us freedom and happiness, however our circumstances may vary. One that will smile amidst the declensions of European and Asiatic empires, and survive the rude storms of time. ” <– This proves that the US Constitution is a constant, as it was written and understood when created; not changing on the whims of those who wish it to.

      That the supreme power is limited, and cannot controul the unalienable rights of mankind, nor resume the equivalent (that is, the security of person and property) which each individual receives, as a consideration for the alienable rights he parted with in entering into political society.
      – That these unalienable rights, and this equivalent, are to be clearly defined and ascertained in a BILL OF RIGHTS, previous to the ratification of any constitution.
      – That the supreme power should be so formed and modelled, as to exert the greatest possible power, wisdom, and goodness.
      – That the legislative, judicial, and executive powers, are to be lodged in different hands, that each branch is to be independent, and further, to be so ballanced, and be able to exert such checks upon the others, as will preserve it from a dependence on, or an union with them.
      – That the laws will be made with the greatest wisdom, and best intentions, when men, of all the several classes in the state concur in the enacting of them."

      John Adams, Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States: "Others, again, more rationally, define a republic to signify only a government, in which all men, rich and poor, magistrates and subjects, officers and people, masters and servants, the first citizen and the last, are equally subject to the laws. This, indeed, appears to be the true and only true definition of a republic."

      Reply this comment
  36. Greg 8 September, 2015, 13:26

    I will just say this small note. I took the oath to support, and defend, the Constitution of the United States, and that I shall do.

    Reply this comment
  37. Paratrooper 8 September, 2015, 14:41

    Does this really surprise anyone? We have to continue to educate others and support those that have the time and means to take our message to the masses. Savoir C’est Pavoir ( Knowlege is Power )

    Reply this comment
  38. Nevada Dave 8 September, 2015, 22:02

    Great article from a great responder to and about a great fool.

    Reply this comment
  39. Louis Fowlkes 10 September, 2015, 12:05

    They speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves. Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

    Reply this comment
  40. Bob 11 September, 2015, 19:12

    Matthew 19:6. What God has made one, let no man separate. Mark 10:11-12 and Luke 16:18. Divorce your spouse and remarry, you commit adultery. 1Corinthians 7:10-11. If you separate, you must remain unmarried or reconciled to your spouse. So, what is a traditional marriage? It is between a man and a woman who honor their vows to love and cherish, for better or worse, till death do you part. My wife and I have been together 30 years, and we love each other as much as the day we fell in love. When you protect a hypocrite and a woman who is committing adultery, you spit in the eyes of millions of Americans who honor their vows. So, while you protect this hypocrite, who is protecting those of us who honor Gods teachings? Who? Definitely not your group. What will the members of your group say to God on judgment day when he asks, “Why do you protect this hypocrite and then turn around and spit in the eyes of those who honor my commandments and practice what is a traditional marriage in my eyes? Your group has shown me what Jesus meant in Matthew 15:8-9. “You honor me with your lips, but your hearts are far from me. They worship me in vain, their teachings are but rules taught by men”. You may have the guns, but those of us who follow the teachings of God have the pen and the protection of God. And the pen is mightier than the sword (in todays world mightier than the gun).

    Reply this comment
  41. floraspec 26 September, 2015, 15:44

    Besides Chuck Baldwin being the Oathkeepers Chaplain, we have a group who are active in the chapel under the support tab at http://www.Oathkeepers.org Come join the dialogue. Thanks.

    Reply this comment
  42. Pastor Dave 25 November, 2015, 00:45

    I’m a former police officer. I became an ordained clergyman in 2000. I see no conflict with my religious position, beliefs, and duties, regarding the Oath Keepers. In fact, I believe in Oath Keepers enough that I would join with a life membership if I had the available funds. I have taken several oaths as a peace officer and still stand by them. My oath, and my loyalty, to the United States Constitution is second only to my God. That’s the level of importance!

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*