NavyJack – Rejecting Identity Politics to Achieve Rightful Liberty

NavyJack – Rejecting Identity Politics to Achieve Rightful Liberty

I was in Washington D.C. Saturday. The weather, until mid-afternoon, was beautiful. It was a great day to immerse one’s self in the meaning of the monuments and reflect on the courage of those that came before us. As I walked back to the National Theater to retrieve my car to head home, I noticed a crowd gathering at the Reagan Convention Center. Some were clearly locals, many were exiting dozens of buses lined up along 15th Street and walking to the protest assembly point.  Many of these “bus people” were in their 20s and early 30s, predominantly male, predominantly white and dressed to stand out in a crowd.  Curious, I decided to get to a vantage point to observe and not be observed.

reagan1

I gleaned from the protester’s dialog that they were there to confront Nazis. That Nazis had taken over the Reagan Center Federal Complex and they, the protesters, were there to expose them and force them out.  The bus people were there to incite anger, disrupt and cause chaos.  The bus people quickly assumed dominance, having brought megaphones, ANTIFA flags and cans that sprayed a foul smelling substance.

At first, there were more city police officers than protesters. This changed over the course of time as more and more bus people and locals arrived. The city police seemed determined to not intervene, even when the bus people were clearly harassing and being aggressive towards anyone they even thought might be attending whatever event was occurring in the Reagan center.

As the protest continued, a young woman acting as if she was a reporter worked her way into the crowd and started asking leading questions to provoke the bus people. She was confident and had a cameraman with her.  The bus people were incited and began throwing expletives at her and spraying their foul smelling substance on her in an attempt to intimidate and get her to leave. Several men attempted to intercede on her behalf when it appeared that she was about to be assaulted.  This young woman was there to start a fight and she succeeded. The ANTIFA bus people attacked her cameraman and anyone that tried to come to their aid. The cameraman was injured. Several of the bus people were detained; one resisted arrest and was forcibly put on the ground and cuffed.

Clearly this entire sequence of events was provoked or staged to some degree. See for yourself (caution – this video contains extremely foul language and violence):

With the violence suppressed by the police and the weather turning extremely windy and cold, I decided to head home.

The National Policy Institute (NPI)

Having returned home, I was extremely curious to figure out the identity and purpose of the groups involved in the Reagan center activities. Clearly there were the bus people, either members of ANTIFA or posing as such. There were the locals, drawn to the event by a Facebook posting. There was the organization being protested; the National Policy Institute (NPI), what appears to be a one man show originating from Montana that promotes “White Nationalism”. This man, Richard Spencer, has a following. Many of his followers are right-leaning journalists, an odd collection of entertainers whose 15 minutes of fame have long since come and gone, and your more traditional White supremacists. This man is clearly a capitalist, not a fascist. His message echoes that of other identity and race-based segregationists, like the New Black Panther Party.  NPI and other White Nationalist organizations promote false comparisons of their philosophy to the Black Lives Matter movement. The Black Lives Matter movement is motivated by events that were intentionally misreported by the MSM to generate outrage in the Black community.  These “hands up don’t shoot” false narratives created racial division, promoted sensationalized fear of local police and provided leverage to the US Department of Justice in their attempt to usurp local police powers and promote the UN Safe Cities initiative.  Leftist progressives have made race and gender based identity politics their entire platform, alienating a great many in this country with hokum theories like “white privilege “and “white male privilege”. It was only a matter of time before groups like NPI would capitalize on the leftist propaganda to promote their own form of divisive rhetoric. The NPI agenda is one of seduction and fear. Using media and messaging directed at those of European decent, the NPI seeks to promote segregation as a means of preservation of White culture.  Clearly by my description, you can see that I am not a fan of identity politics or any form of race-based nationalism.

npi_nazi

Promoted by Teli Tequila on Her NPI Special Guest Appearance

The Main Stream Media (MSM) is desperately trying to tie organizations like NPI to President Elect Donald Trump. The White Nationalists are all in favor of this association and are using the term “Alt-Right” to define themselves. This has effectively validated the MSM and allowed the MSM to categorize any conservative or right leaning cause as “Alt-Right” and thereby infer “White Nationalism”. Of course these associations are false and there is absolutely no validity to the original MSM attempts to tie President Elect Trump to these “White Nationalist” causes, but because of the desire of organizations like NPI to become accepted, their claims of support from the President Elect are being used to validate the MSM propaganda. It is a bad situation that President Elect Trump will have to address, soon.

ANTIFA

npi_violenceThe term “ANTIFA” is activist political slang, short for anti-fascist. It is the widely-used abbreviation for the German Anti-Fascist Action (AFA) group.  It refers especially to militant anti-fascists who engage in physical confrontations with Nazis. In the United States, they are a group of people belonging loosely to a series of interconnected anonymous cliques; adherents to a simplistic view of the world; to them everything that isn’t far-left or collectivist is ‘fascist’ ‘racist’ or ‘nazi’.

They have an intense dislike for ‘White Imperialism’ or ‘White-Capitalism’.  Their perspective of the world is based on the conspiracy that most White people are on a mission to exploit and crush everybody on the planet that is not White.  In the world of the ANTIFA, White people are intrinsically ‘fascist’ and responsible for all Earthly woes.  I seriously doubt that that the “bus people” ANTIFA at the Reagan center melee have any lineage or true association to the German Anti-Fascist Action group. More likely, they are agitators sponsored by George Soros or some other leftist organization dissapointed by the outcome of the recent election. Oath Keeper’s Operation HYPO personnel photographed several of these same “ANTIFA” actors at the Baltimore Maryland anti-Trump protest on 11 November, 2016.

Rightful Liberty and the Rejection of Identity Politics

As all true patriots know in their heart, rightful liberty is the exact opposite of identity politics. Anyone promoting a claim of superiority based on race is not a patriot in the context of the Declaration of Independence. Now while the original U.S. Constitution did not sanctify the depth of Jeffersonian Rightful Liberty, it was the true cause that brought our nation together and was the reason that the founding fathers pursued independence and fought the revolutionary war.

“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others.” Thomas Jefferson

Liberty, having been endowed to all of us equally by our Creator, is our sacred right and therefore unalienable and only limited by the equal rights of others. Equal human rights and equality before law was the argument of the American Revolution expressed by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence.

Thomas Jefferson said, liberty is the gift of God — because rightful human liberty is a function of equal human rights derived from infinite God-given human value.

And;

“God who gave us life gave us liberty. Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?”

Stay the Course

As patriots, we must reject all forms of identity politics. We must reject people and causes that seek to divide the people of our nation. We must stand against those who would use race, religion or heritage to claim supremacy or unequal rights. If you are a patriot, you must not only believe that human liberty is a function of equal human rights, you must practice, promote and defend it. If you truly are a patriot, you must stand against the “George Soros bus people” that seek to divide us and use violence to force their conspiracy theories onto others. I ask that each of you reflect on what you can individually do to help heal the wounds being inflicted by the MSM as they seek to destroy the promise of America. I pray that the President Elect will be able to expose the MSM and those using identity politics to divide us. I pray that Rightful Liberty is the result of the great political revolution fought recently at the ballot box. I pray this message can still be heard by those so infected with MSM propaganda that their hearts are filled with hate against those who seek to restore the promise and value of the U.S. Constitution. God bless America.

navyjack

About Author

Navy Jack

During my service I deployed on various platforms, including submarines, amphibious assault units and special boats. I participated in expeditionary and humanitarian missions to the North Atlantic, Iran, Beirut, Libya, and the Caribbean. I am a Patron Life Member of the NRA. I am an Oath Keeper Life Member.

Comments

  1. Yoda 21 November, 2016, 09:31

    I pray this message can still be heard by those so infected with MSM propaganda that their hearts are filled with hate against those who seek to restore the promise and value of the U.S. Constitution. God bless America.
    Well Jack, those were the last two concluding sentences of your article. And I would like to focus on those words. I see your article as being all about the forces of division and the forces of unification. The conclusion is to rally around the Constitution. I’m an old white man, Jack. I’ll be seventy soon. All that really means is that I’ve been around for quite some time and have seen and experienced a lot and I can tell you some of the things that I have concluded.
    You cannot ask a black man or woman to view the Constitution in the same way that a white man or woman views it. For most of the history of this nation, the Constitution did not equally apply to them. When a black person reflects on the Constitution, the truth of history gets in the way. White folks have to acknowledge that the Constitution has not always guaranteed all the basic God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to all men equally. The same can be said concerning the American Indian and other races. So it is so very easy for our enemy to use our own history against us. It should be easy for us all to see that the word patriot would be viewed differently by different races. We surly need to acknowledge that.
    So what do we now say? The Constitution is now applied equally? I’m thinking that the God-given equality mentioned in our historical documents is still a work in progress. I stand with Dr. Martin Luther King on this one. I also have a dream. It is simple. We should recognize the forces that continually seek to divide us. We should try very hard to forgive. And we should prove our belief in those God-given freedoms by our actions.
    The forces that seek to keep this nation can be identified. They are the globalists. I find it amazing that the ones who claim to be working toward a global community would promote division but this is what is taking place. My conclusion to all of this is that we should all rally around national sovereignty. Once we secure that, we can continue to work on making the glory of the Constitution apply to all. I so love the addition to the pledge of allegiance where it states “One nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all”. I will also conclude with the same prayer. God bless America.

    Reply this comment
    • Navy Jack Author 21 November, 2016, 10:26

      Yoda, well said. I briefly addressed this in the article with “the original U.S. Constitution did not sanctify the depth of Jeffersonian Rightful Liberty” link and reference, but your discussion is more accurate and appreciated. Having read the letters and writings of many of the Founding Fathers prior to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, I believe that many were severely concerned about the potential for the unequal treatment exactly as you describe. Several wanted to move to immediate emancipation of the slaves as well. That being said, divisiveness will never solve these issues. I certainly appreciate how history gets in the way. That does not change how we should honor and defend the rights of all citizens going forward. History is as imperfect as the people who lived it. Those people are now gone, their sins are not our sins. We have each and every day of our lives to show our commitment to Rightful Liberty. Those whose ancestors were oppressed, have each and every day to experience the freedoms their ancestors fought so hard to obtain. The pursuit of liberty is our joint cause, not a cause that serves to separate us.

      Reply this comment
    • WGP 21 November, 2016, 12:37

      There is an important part of this racist segregation and discrimination piece not being said here.Those that shoot each other down in cold blood on a daily basis are not mentally or educationally tuned in to equality via a constitution or God given right, or the eloquent words of our founding fathers, but are driven by the hate they have for each other that is propagated among their own leaders. Herr Furor in the rainbow house and his divisionist elite colleagues have intentionally created a non working class of youth and succeeded in baiting them into extreme division and spreading hate between every class and social fabric. It fits perfectly with the Chicago example being spread across all America and modern free world economies around the planet.

      Strong leadership will promote law and order, rather than the current 8 year sort of Soros branded hate speech. and these bus people will be dealt with in a swift legal fashion starting with the top offenders Soros, et al. I see Trump as a person who will promote the truth about the people and organizations you pray about. Truth will take care of crooked MSM and the criminal political cronies who are leading the useful idiot bus people to engage in vending chaos.

      Reply this comment
      • Yoda 21 November, 2016, 14:32

        WGP, I’m not quite sure why you decided to reply to my comment rather that comment to the article. For the record, I agree with everything Jack said in the article. You address those who do the violence and those who promote the violence. Jack has done a real good job concerning that but, like my comment, you have, you have to follow Jack’s writings to get the big picture.
        Since you brought it up, I will say something about strong leadership. Joseph Stalin was a strong leader but so was Mahatma Gandhi. I choose Gandhi. Here is the deal. Our presidents are like rent-a-leaders. They come and go. There is a reason why the Preamble to our Constitution begins with “We the people”. The direction of this nation was entrusted to us. We don’t elect a king for a term and there is no “magic man” to lead us in or out of trouble. There is a collective soul of this nation and, right now, its pretty darned sick. We are one nation and we must heal ourselves. So we must fight the invaders and bring ourselves back to health. Amazing that our enemies declare that we can only be destroyed from within by our own hands. So I say lets go about the business of fixing ourselves. We can’t win by forcing our will upon others. We have to come together and reason things out. I’m not advocating letting evil get away with evil. I am advocating a rescue mission for those who are caught up in evil. Let the evil burn but rescue the perishing. Its kind of a Christian thing.

        Reply this comment
        • WGP 22 November, 2016, 11:35

          It’s called adding to the conversation. No mention was made of being critical of you or anyone else here. I’m well aware of those things you added to the comments. Cheers!

          Reply this comment
        • Nick 18 July, 2017, 08:41

          Just a note here on Mahatma Gandhi. While its admirable that you subscribe to the illusion that is promoted as a peaceful resistance, few refer back to Gandhi’s words; “Among the many misdeeds of British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”
          In fact the movement led by Gandhi was not at all a peace movement, but rather a pacifist movement. Unfortunately, not for public consumption is the fact that thousands were killed during the movement. Having an option to bear arms, in Gandhi’s mind was the proper way to go; “If the middle classes render voluntary help to Government in the hour of its trial, distrust will disappear, and the ban on possessing arms will be withdrawn.”
          The reason for promoting Gandhi as being peaceful, rather than having no other choice is to keep the masses in check. What we should be focusing on is the fact that we already absolutely refuse and disparage the second part of Gandhi’s expression, which correlates to “A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state”.
          In fact when we are prepared to bear arms, we are more than likely to attain the healing through peace. Peaceful reconciliation requires two like minds. If one mind continues to act as this government does with the help of its “useful idiots” in the populace, the notion of peace, in our time, is an illusion.
          At this point I thought it might be obvious, but apparently we hope beyond hope to tame the tiger we let run wild for decades.

          Reply this comment
  2. Chip 21 November, 2016, 10:57

    Yoda…is it that “the Constitution did not equally apply to them” as you put it? Or isn’t it more that the “Constitution was not always applied to them equally”? My point being that IMHO the Constitution itself as it stands cannot be anything but equal…it is our own flawed nature that is responsible for most of these past transgressions. The Constitution can’t correct that. I guess that’s where God comes in? As NJ says, “The pursuit of liberty is our joint cause, not a cause that serves to separate us.” Those muddying the waters are painting themselves as our “domestic enemies”.

    Reply this comment
    • Yoda 21 November, 2016, 13:30

      Here is the point I was making, Chip. History plays a very meaningful part in a person’s regard for the Constitution. For instance, if your grandmother or great grandmother was Rosa Parks, you might not place as much reverence to the document as someone of Anglo-Saxon heritage. I doubt that you can dismiss history as something shallow. I wish I had a better example but I’ll try this one. A person can have full understand of combat but can’t fully appreciate the awesome influence of it on one’s soul without actually experiencing it. The reality is that the Constitution did not apply to them in those days.

      Reply this comment
      • Chip 21 November, 2016, 17:02

        I know what you are saying Yoda. The problem is that it casts fault on the best blueprint for true social justice ever devised. What I am trying to say is this: Your perspective of the sun standing in LA is totally different than mine standing in NYC in the very same moment. But the sun is still the one and only sun, irrespective of our views.

        Reply this comment
  3. Elder Son 21 November, 2016, 16:49

    You might not be interested in identity politics, but I can assure you, identity politics is interested in you. I’m not going to play the game that, “I checked my privilege, and it says I don’t have to put up with your crap anymore,” as some kind of code for being racists. Whether you get it or not, whites are sick and tired for being blamed for everything wrong in America by the globalist Lib-Tards, Gamma-Males, and Fem-Skanks. Anyone thinking that they are going to play the globalist “We are the World” is going to get them somewhere, is in for a rude awakening. whether you want to believe it or not, the globalist Lib-Tards, Gamma-Males, and Fem-Skanks mean to white genocide you if you believe in traditional white culture. Then the cucks come along as say… that’s racist! And that is how traditional white culture, that made America… has died.

    Are you the POSTERITY they were talking about? Probably not. Blessing, 1635.

    Reply this comment
  4. Yoda 23 November, 2016, 15:15

    I am much like WGP in that I’m just trying to have a conversation here. Dialogue is important, especially with such blatant information warfare being carried out. In keeping with the subject of the article which is identity politics, I would like to address (white nationalists). I assume that the groups are somewhat akin to the Aryan Nation or other skinhead groups. Now a lot of those guys are in prison for crimes they have committed and not specifically for their ideology. My point is that I am not like them nor am I one of them.
    I offer up two definitions.
    NATIONALISM
    The term “nationalism” is generally used to describe two phenomena: (1) the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (2) the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. (1) raises questions about the concept of a nation (or national identity), which is often defined in terms of common origin, ethnicity, or cultural ties, and specifically about whether an individual’s membership in a nation should be regarded as non-voluntary or voluntary. (2) raises questions about whether self-determination must be understood as involving having full statehood with complete authority over domestic and international affairs, or whether something less is required.
    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nationalism/

    Simple Definition of NATIONALIST from Merriam-Webster’s Learner’s Dictionary

    : a supporter of or believer in nationalism
    • : a member of a political group that wants to form a separate and independent nation
    There is some wiggle room when you look at these two definitions but, by picking and choosing, I can absolutely identify myself as a nationalist. In fact, I am totally committed to being one. I am also white by race. Can’t do a thing about that. Combine the fact that I am white with the fact that I am a nationalist and that makes me a white nationalist. I get the feeling that someone has hijacked my identity. This is just food for thought because we are in a war and the war is nationalists against the globalists. Throwing the identifier of white out there IMO is an attempt to bring race into the conflict. That is information warfare. It highlights racism and obscures nationalism. A white man can no longer identify himself as a nationalist because the picture has been painted in the minds of Americans that it equates to white supremacy. Damn the dialectic!

    Reply this comment
  5. Elder Son 23 November, 2016, 17:18

    Diversity + Proximity = War

    It always comes down to it. Historical fact. Look at Europe. The globalists believe in some kind of Unicorn rainbow idea that everyone is just going to breed together and create one big happy mutt family world.

    It doesn’t happen that way. When a race/culture becomes the predominate race/culture in a country not their own, that country has been conquered and is no longer its former self.

    There are 2 ways to look at identity politics. Globalism. And Nationalism. It’s one, or the other. The question for America and Europe is, which race/culture is going to prevail.

    Like I said, you might not be interested in identity politics, but I can assure you, identity politics is interested in you. One can be a globalist, or one can be a nationalist. There is no in-between. No matter how much you try to force feed it.

    Now, we can quote the founders all day. But when they spoke of their posterity, who do you think they meant? The idea of freedom and liberty bestowed upon America didn’t come from… Africa, Middle East, Persia, Asia… Identity politics will either be the final ruin of America, or its savior.

    Reply this comment
    • Navy Jack Author 24 November, 2016, 08:33

      Elder Son, you make it sound like Europeans were able to get along just fine for the past 2,000 years. No, identity politics is simply a tool used by those who would be your masters to divide and conquer. Identity politics is not nationalism or globalism.

      Nationalism, not perverted by identity politics, is what Jefferson envisioned. Nationalism has borders. Nationalism has laws that apply to all races, religions and cultures within the nation’s borders. Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. This is what the revolution was fought to achieve. It was the compromises of the Constitutional Convention that perverted that vision in order to not alienate three Southern States from inclusion in the new nation.

      Globalism is the consolidation of nation states into unions ruled by an unelected upper class. The European Union is Globalism. Globalism is simply the conquest of nations by wealthy families and their corporations into a fascist oligarchy that ignores the rights of both the people and the nation states that it consumes for greed.

      Identity politics is the seduction of people to effect division and obtain power. The simplistic ideology of the “white nationalist” completely ignores history, the history of the very people of European decent whose culture they claim to be protecting. It is a fool’s game to think that the major wars, led by those who used identity politics to both divide and conquer nations, never occurred. Those who preach this rhetoric are charlatans. Imagine that for the whole of history that no leaders came into power within a nation by demonizing groups of their own citizens.

      How pure can a race or culture be made? Irish, Welsh, Anglo-Saxon, Scot. One must forget all of history and that these wars ever occurred to accept the white nationalist arguments. One must forget World War II to believe that leaders do not use identity politics to demonize their own citizens to obtain power in search of Lebensraum.

      I will have nothing to do with this ideology or those who practice it. I will condemn it at every opportunity as the very opposite of Rightful Liberty.

      Rightful liberty means you don’t condemn Mormons because they are not Catholics. It means you don’t condemn Quakers because they choose to live an alternate lifestyle. This means you don’t force your will on me and I don’t impose mine on you. It doesn’t mean that I cannot personally disapprove of an aspect of your religion or culture. It does mean that I have chosen to live in a society where my opinion cannot be forced upon you. It means that unless you infringe on my rights or violate the law I have no argument to bring to court against you. It means that Government never condemns culture or beliefs that do not infringe on the equal rights of others. It means that Government never endorses my beliefs as superior to your beliefs.

      Rightful liberty requires citizens to accept all races, all religions all cultures as long as the adherents to the religion and/or culture do not attempt to infringe on your rights or violate the law. It doesn’t mean we just leave our border open and hope for the best. It means we secure our border and only admit those to our nation who will abide by our laws at a rate of entry that doesn’t result in economic hardship for our citizens. It means we can exclude those who have a history of violence or crime. It means that we can suspend immigration from nations that seek to harm us. Our nation should have a common language, not because a lot of us have “English” bloodlines, but because we need to be able to communicate with each other. Immigrants should be required to learn our laws, speak our language and accept the limitations on their exercise of culture and religion before ever becoming citizens. The limitation of which I speak is that which is defined by Rightful Liberty.

      Reply this comment
      • Elder Son 24 November, 2016, 21:18

        “Elder Son, you make it sound like Europeans were able to get along just fine for the past 2,000 years. ”

        No. YOU – said that. I call it inter-tribal warfare. I can see that you have visions of me standing in front of a Nazi flag, raising my right hand in adulation to Hitler, and shouting, “Sieg Heil”. No, seriously. And LMAO.

        You just can not get over this HISTORICAL fact: When a race/culture becomes the predominate race/culture in a country not their own, that country has been conquered and is no longer its former self. But then, maybe you think America is… Magic Dirt? The… Proposition Nation? I invite you to go to Africa, Middle East, South America, Asia, and etc., and tell them your Thomas Jefferson quote, and while they laugh in your face, you can invite them to America. How is all that Thomas Jefferson rightful liberty working out, in say… Europe right now? How is it working out in Africa, Middle East, South America, Asia?

        You might also do some more reading on Thomas Jefferson. Try to get in his head a little bit, as a whole, in context, of his beliefs. I am reminded of the ignorant, or just the plain old Lib-Tards, Gamma-Males, and Fem-Skanks quoting scripture, from a sentence, in a paragraph, to make a point, entirely out of context. The man that made that quote, what else do you know about him, and his character?

        And like I said, who are the POSTERITY they were talking about? The millions of illegals coming across the border? The thousands of Muslims being settled into America? Africans? You think the vast majority care about your T.J. quote? The con-stee-too-tion?

        Blessing, 1635 – Original posterity – X 2. Parentage – English/Irish/Choctaw. Andrew Jackson may have removed my Choctaw ancestors in the Trail of Tears, but Thomas Jefferson was the original purveyor of it… rightful liberty, and all.

        When you become the white minority in America, get back with me on that Rightful Liberty thing… and globalist visions of the New Babylon. Calling Ambassador Power? And makes no mistake, whites are just as much a problem for the cultural shift in America.

        Reply this comment
        • Navy Jack Author 24 November, 2016, 23:46

          Elder Son,
          You said “Diversity + Proximity = War” and “When you become the white minority in America, get back with me on that Rightful Liberty thing.”

          I say “How would you like me to read these types of statements?”

          You said “The idea of freedom and liberty bestowed upon America didn’t come from… Africa, Middle East, Persia, Asia…”

          I say “Inspiration for our form of Government and many of our founding principles are based on Masonic teachings which originated in Africa, Persia and the Middle-East.”

          “Our records inform us, that the usages and customs of Masons have ever corresponded with those of the Egyptian philosophers, to which they bear a near affinity. Unwilling to expose their mysteries to vulgar eyes, they concealed their particular tenets, and principles of polity, under hieroglyphical figures; and expressed their notions of government by signs and symbols, which they communicated to their Magi alone, who were bound by oath not to reveal them” (Thomas Smith Webb, PGM, The Freemason’s Monitor Cincinnati: The Pettibone Bros., 1797, p.39).

          The leaders of the American Revolution were, in the main, Freemasons: Paul Revere was Junior Warden of the 15th St. Andrew’s Lodge; Peyton Randolph, a Freemason from Virginia, was President of the First Continental Congress; Freemason delegates to the Second Continental Congress included John Hancock and Benjamin Franklin. George Washington was a Freemason; under Washington was an army led largely by Masonic commanders, including Brigadier Gen. Richard Montgomery, Col. Benedict Arnold, John Sullivan, Col. John Glover, Nathanael Greene; foreign officers who arrived in 1777 to aid the cause of the Continental army were also Freemasons, including Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, Peter Stephen Du Ponceau, Thaddeus Kosciusko and the Marquis de Lafayette. The Constitutional Committee consisted of Freemasons, including Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin (Grand Master of Pennsylvania), John Adams, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston (who would become Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of New York).

          You said “You might also do some more reading on Thomas Jefferson. Try to get in his head a little bit, as a whole, in context, of his beliefs. I am reminded of the ignorant, or just the plain old Lib-Tards, Gamma-Males, and Fem-Skanks quoting scripture, from a sentence, in a paragraph, to make a point, entirely out of context. The man that made that quote, what else do you know about him, and his character?”

          I say “Throughout his entire life, Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of slavery. Calling it a ‘moral depravity’ and a ‘hideous blot,’ he believed that slavery presented the ‘greatest threat to the survival of the new American nation’. Jefferson also thought that slavery was ‘contrary to the laws of nature’, which decreed that ‘everyone had a right to personal liberty’. At the time of the American Revolution, Jefferson was actively involved in legislation that he hoped would result in slavery’s abolition. In 1778, he drafted a Virginia law that prohibited the importation of enslaved Africans. In 1784, he proposed an ordinance that would ban slavery in the Northwest Territories. Jefferson also believed that to keep slaves in bondage, with part of America in favor of abolition and part of America in favor of perpetuating slavery, could only result in a civil war that would destroy the union.“

          You said “How is all that Thomas Jefferson rightful liberty working out, in say… Europe right now?”

          I said “The European Union is Globalism. Globalism is simply the conquest of nations by wealthy families and their corporations into a fascist oligarchy that ignores the rights of both the people and the nation states that it consumes for greed.”

          I will add “Rightful liberty has never been practiced or codified into law in Europe in all of recorded history. Europe has always been tribal and has never embraced this philosophy. The current immigration/open borders situation which has resulted in an explosion of violent crime, rape and economic destruction is a direct result of the member countries forced acquiescence to the EU demands by leverage of debt.”

          You said “And like I said, who are the POSTERITY they were talking about? The millions of illegals coming across the border? The thousands of Muslims being settled into America? Africans? You think the vast majority care about your T.J. quote? The con-stee-too-tion?”

          I said “Rightful liberty requires citizens to accept all races, all religions all cultures as long as the adherents to the religion and/or culture do not attempt to infringe on your rights or violate the law. It doesn’t mean we just leave our border open and hope for the best. It means we secure our border and only admit those to our nation who will abide by our laws at a rate of entry that doesn’t result in economic hardship for our citizens. It means we can exclude those who have a history of violence or crime. It means that we can suspend immigration from nations that seek to harm us. Our nation should have a common language, not because a lot of us have “English” bloodlines, but because we need to be able to communicate with each other. Immigrants should be required to learn our laws, speak our language and accept the limitations on their exercise of culture and religion before ever becoming citizens.”

          You said “When you become the white minority in America, get back with me on that Rightful Liberty thing.”

          I say “I live in Baltimore. I am white and whites are a minority (65% black, 31% white, 3% all others)”

          Reply this comment
          • Elder Son 25 November, 2016, 02:12

            Yes, Jefferson on the slaves. But, when did he FREE his slaves, and, more importantly, what did he think of the black man in general? What were his ideas on what to do with the slaves?

            Well, you can throw out the Founders were Free Masons out there and claim that their idea’s came from ancient Africa, Persia, and the Middle East, none of which espoused remotely the idea’s rightful liberty in all of its history… and muddy the waters.

            Rightful liberty has never been codified in American law either. But, where did the thesis, the very idea’s, of rightful liberty, and freedom in general, originate? Africa? Persia? Middle East? Any idea? Maybe from “secret” and “lost” writings of… Nimrod? Mystery Babylon? Right! The Egyptians!

            How many of those 65% black, 31% white, and 3% other espouse “rightful liberty”? How many foreign migrants?

            Anyhow, no matter which way you cut it, you are a small g globalist. And, believes that America is some magic dirt that all one just has to do is just touch the magic dirt, and instant presto, a All American rightful liberty posterity. Whether foreigners come to America legally, or illegally, the vast majority have no concept of your rightful liberty. No one becomes any different of who and what they are, once they touch the magic dirt.

            And one more thing, most people, including white people anymore, could care less about “rightful liberty”. What do you propose to do with them? Because, the advocates of “rightful liberty” (Ya know, originating from Africa, Persia, and the Middle East as per our founding Free Masons) are vastly outnumbered. Now see? And you think I am a white supremesist. Although it is obvious, still is some cases, despite the globalist idea’s that have saturated the minds of white countries, that white countries are far superior to… Africa, Persia, Middle East, Mexico, South America, China culture. You can always start a “Rightful Liberty” crusade in these non-white countries… no? And yes, I’d like to keep America as white as possible. That means no immigration/migration. Africa for Africans, Mexico for Mexicans, Asia for Asians, etc. Because no matter which way you want to slice it, white culture, is still far superior. And I don’t want to muddy the waters.

            And you are thinking… I won’t sit down with a black man, whose ancestors were brought here as slaves, who actually believes in freedom and liberty, and eat at his table.

          • Navy Jack Author 25 November, 2016, 10:49

            Elder Son,
            I am a Nationalist. America and its people, regardless of race, must come first in the application of our generosity and the execution of our laws. To say otherwise is folly. I am staunchly opposed to illegal immigration and to any form of amnesty for those who have violated our immigration or other laws. I am fiercely opposed to the open borders mandate and all other policies of the Globalists. I have written about this extensively. Your statement that I am a small “g” Globalist is offensive and not reflective of the great effort and personal risk that I have contributed to its defeat. It is the minorities in our nation who suffer the most when hordes of refugees and immigrants are imported without consideration that they now are competing with minorities for the limited resources available to sustain them. I am talking about jobs, affordable housing and the ability to receive healthcare. Black unemployment has doubled because of our open borders. We have imported far too many refugees without proper screening or prospects for long term sustainment. We have crippled our inner-cities with gang members from MS-13 and other criminal enterprises. Our border must be closed, not to preserve our “whiteness”, but to sustain and protect our citizens, regardless of the color of their skin. New immigration and refugee programs must consider our ability to educate, sustain and employ any future immigrants.

            Jefferson knew that if he emancipated his slaves, because of his prominence, others in the Northern States would do the same. The civil war would have happened 60 years earlier. He also knew that the blacks were for the most part uneducated and that to emancipate them would require a multi-year program of education if they were ever going to be able to fit into society. Jefferson lived during the time of the Haitian revolution. He feared it could happen in the new republic. In 1791, the slaves in Haiti revolted against the French plantation owners. Before the fighting ended 100,000 of the 500,000 blacks in Haiti and 24,000 of the 40,000 whites were killed.

            The founder’s Freemason association is central to both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The point in bringing this up is to demonstrate that Jefferson’s beliefs were based on much broader concepts that those of strictly European decent. The founders heavily relied on the writings of both Plato and Aristotle in their development of the Constitution and insisted, as did Plato, that a Republic was a far superior form of government to that of a Democracy. Both Plato and Aristotle derived much of their philosophy from Egypt.

            The legal tenants of Rightful Liberty are codified to a great extent by the Bill of Rights.

            You state that “I’d like to keep America as white as possible”. Let me remind you that there were over 9,000 black Patriot soldiers that fought for your freedom in the revolution. Before the revolution even started, many free African Americans supported the anti-British cause, most famously Crispus Attucks, believed to be the first person killed at the Boston Massacre. At the time of the American Revolution, blacks had already been enlisted as Minutemen. Both free and enslaved Africans had served in local militias, especially in the North. In April 1775, at Lexington and Concord, blacks responded to the call and fought with Patriot forces. Prince Estabrook a black minuteman was wounded during the fighting on 19 April at Lexington. The Battle of Bunker Hill also had African-American soldiers fighting along with white Patriots, such as Peter Salem; Salem Poor, Barzillai Lew, Blaney Grusha, Titus Coburn, Alexander Ames, Cato Howe, and Seymour Burr. Many African Americans, both enslaved and free, joined with the Patriots. I would also encourage Patriots learn about Fort Conde, LA which was at the center of the Hispanic’s contribution to the fight for America’s independence.

            Elder Son, you owe the very freedom to speak of keeping “America as white as possible” to these black and Hispanic men; not to mention the thousands that died fighting in subsequent wars to preserve it. As I said earlier, I will have nothing to do with a race-based nationalist ideology or those who practice it. This conversation is over.

  6. Yoda 24 November, 2016, 07:25

    Elder Son, you are 100% right when you say that the struggle is between nationalism and globalism. We must realize that it is the globalists who promote division in America. They have done everything they an to destroy our national identity. It is the “magic bullet” for them because, as long as we continue to fight among ourselves on issues such as race, culture, religion, ideology, and anything and everything else, we will not be fighting them. Here is a thought to consider. Maybe we should put our differences aside for now and focus on the enemy. The global elites are the enemy of us all.
    Does that sound just too crazy? Consider the Allied Forces of WWII. There were communists fighting with capitalists against a common enemy. Nations had to put aside everything that divided them to fight Nazi Germany. I think this is what must be done in America. Globalism has every intention to enslave all of humanity. They will succeed unless humanity rises up to defeat them.
    How can this be done in America? Well, we have to focus on the enemy instead of focusing on each other. This is the course we should stay on. I will say just a couple of more things. Our forefathers broke with both their race and their culture. First, they declared that all men were created equal. Secondly, they broke with the Anglo-Saxon culture when they threw off the power of the monarch in favor of power to the people. Thirdly, they broke with a state religion. The Constitution offers freedom for all. So I say lets put aside all that divides us and fight the common enemy. That focus makes us all allies. Destroy the common enemy. Then reinstate the Constitution. I see in that a path to recovery.

    Reply this comment
    • CrazyPork 12 June, 2017, 10:55

      The communists and capitalists teamed up because they are both inherently globalist. Stop buying this false dichotomy that it was capitalists vs communists. It makes perfect sense once you stop the mental frame you’ve trapped yourself in.

      Reply this comment
    • Praise Kek 12 June, 2017, 11:03

      “they broke away from Anglo-Saxon culture” Then why are using English? America received mostly Germans before 1965 yet very little of the German immigrants descendants speak German, they speak English. The majority in this country is still of White European heritage and they are the people who founded and settled this nation, every other ethnic group has contributed little or nothing to America’s foundation. They are just newcomers who seek to steal everything that our ancestors bequeathed to us. You say that our forefathers declared every to he equal, then why did the man who wrote that have so many slaves? The founding fathers were not egalitarians and they just used that language to sugar coat their words like the French in their own revolution. We must destroy a common enemy, I agree, but identity for White Europeans is here to stay.

      Reply this comment
  7. Ghetto Tarzan 3 February, 2017, 14:53

    You can reject identity politics all you want but it will be in vain. The enemy has made the decision about who you are and what you represent for you. At this point it’s naive to oppose identity politics. Every other group embraces identity politics and sees you as an outsider and the enemy

    Reply this comment
  8. Victor 12 June, 2017, 10:55

    Thomas Jefferson was a white nationalist who wanted the black slaves to be bought up by the government and deported back to Africa. Neither he nor any of the other Founding Fathers (or any president up until the 1960s, for that matter) believed in your de-racinated fairy tales.

    Reply this comment
  9. Common Plebe 12 June, 2017, 10:58

    Culture is downstream from demographics. You can adhere to constitutional values all you want, but it’s meaningless when those people being shipped here don’t understand it nor care. We can have diversity or we can have nice things. Take your own side.

    Reply this comment
  10. James_B 12 June, 2017, 11:09

    There is nothing racist or immoral about people of European descent (white people) appreciating our ancestral heritage and standing up to the anti-white bias prevalent in our culture. We’re not “racist, ” and we’re not against anyone else. Every other group of people are allowed to stand of for their interests, except for whites. My good friend is a high school teacher, and she talks all the time about how biased and one sided it is. Black students cannot be disciplined because it’s labeled racist, and they’re passed no matter how poor their grades. Meanwhile, they cuss and attack white students and teachers, and we’re basically defenseless because of all the political correctness. If you like at the crime rates, white people are very often targeted by other groups. We’re called names like bigot, nazi, etc whenever we try to stand up for our interests. What about freedom of speech? There’s literally nothing hateful about whites standing up for our ancestral heritage and for our children and our future. People just don’t understand where we are coming from. The older, baby boomer generation especially doesn’t get it. This is not the 1960’s anymore. This is a completely different society abd a completely different culture that has shifted, and our children are going to suffer because of it. We have mass immigration flooding into Western Europe. White English people are now a minority in London. Sweden also has mass immigration and are taught to hate their own native Swedish culture and people. Even saying someone is English or Irish is taboo and labeled racist. Do you all not understand? Being white and loving your heritage of labeled racist. To even speak of “English people” is labeled hate speech. It is insanity. Also, according to the Pew Research Center, white babies are now a minority in America. It’s a fact that we’re being ethnically displaced. We are trying to stand up for our ancestors and for our people, when ever other group gets to do this. I know for a fact that I’m not a Nazi, bigot, [insert buzz word here]. I’m just a guy who loves my people and wants to take down the anti-white narrative we’re all being fed. Thankfully, i found a really good pro-white organization and I’m able to share with others of like mind. I’m sure people will misunderstand, I’m but I’m here tell you it’s not wrong to preserve your heritage or love your ancestors. I’m a member of Identity Evropa. I’m willing to have a conversation. It’s my contention that people have this imaginary image of what we are, when you can just talk to us and see we are normal people who authentically care and believe in our ideals, and what we’re doing is good and important, if only people can wake up and see.

    Reply this comment
  11. MKD 12 June, 2017, 12:24

    Sorry bud – I fight for my people. And when the government starts carting folks from incompatible cultures over by the planeload and handing them citizenship, then “my people” stops meaning whatever the government decided to deem American today.

    You can continue to point the finger at those standing beside you and accuse them of being divisive, but it is you pushing people away here. And for what? See how many liberals cross over to your side thanks to this post. They aren’t even reading this, and they’ll still call you racist Nazis no matter how many allies you dump on. There’s a time for idealism and a time for realism. You are playing a game of chess that you are on the verge of losing, and you’re making moves like you still have the luxury of picking and choosing between pieces.

    I care about this movement, which is why I offer this advice – your diverse, multicultural army of pawns and knights, queens and kings does not exist anywhere except in your mind. Look at the voting demographics and who the founding fathers frankly stated they intended this country for. Look at who built this country from the ground up, and who has an actual stake in its future. Welcome yourself back into the real world please, because it’s time to start thinking strategically. In chess, there are two colors – black and white – and you only get to move one side. Whether you like it or not you are in the game, so get a grip and come to terms with the team you are playing for, and at the very least stop attacking your own side. You don’t have to like them, you don’t have to support them, but for god’s sake shut the hell up with the blue on blue. This going down with the ship crap may be good enough for you, but I’ll be d*mned if my kids suffer for the ego of a bunch of non-hacking dorks scared of lefties calling them names.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*