NavyJack – Communists Intend to Overthrow the United States before Inauguration Day (Updated 01/12/2017)

NavyJack – Communists Intend to Overthrow the United States before Inauguration Day (Updated 01/12/2017)

“Just because a group says that their goal is to keep Trump out of office, doesn’t mean their plan is plausible. Without the support of both the current President and the Senate, my personal opinion is that they are wasting their time.” – NavyJack

In previous articles I have reviewed the planned activities of the ANSWER Coalition, #DisruptJ20 and the ANTIFA during the week leading up to the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States. In this article we will review a new and even more dangerous organization, Refuse Fascism, which has stated their intent to stop the inauguration and prevent Donald Trump from becoming President.


On the surface this stated goal may seem unclear, but when you review their action plan you find the following:

“It is true that the current widespread opposition to this fascist regime could end up becoming deeply disoriented, demoralized, and decimated through repression. But it is also true that the current angst and outrage could be transformed, in a very short, telescoped period of time, into resistance which reaches such massive proportions, and is characterized by such a depth of determination, that it actually creates a ‘crisis of rule,’ and prevents the Trump/Pence fascist regime from consolidating its hold on the governance of society.”


“And this must be done before this regime officially takes power, isolates and crushes opposition, and moves forcefully to implement its fascist program.  The aim must be nothing less than to create such a profound political crisis before the intended inauguration (January 20, 2017) that the fascist regime is actually not able to take the reins of government.”

This organization is clearly promoting treason against the people and the Constitution of United States of America. Our Operation HYPO team has penetrated this organization, attended their meetings and communicated with their leadership. Their intent is to create a crisis in Washington, D.C. before January 20, 2017. The crisis will manifest thru sustained protests starting on January 14, reaching a crescendo not later than January 19 with supporting “direct” actions including blocking roads, vandalism, and stopping Metro subway service starting on January 17. The following is an example of the scenario they envision:

“As 2011 dawned, President Hosni Mubarak had ruled Egypt for decades and seemed to be immovably implanted in power.  But Mubarak was forced to leave office and actually arrested after being confronted by massive demonstrations that braved very severe repression, focused in the main square in Cairo, along with opposition from all sectors of society manifesting in different ways.  From the time of the first demonstrations to the removal of Mubarak took less than a month.”

Refuse Fascism is promoting riots as a method to achieve their stated goals, suggesting the need for much larger events than the massively destructive and deadly riots that occurred in Ferguson, MO and Baltimore, MD.

“These protests could be something with the character of the protests against police murder over the past few years… but larger by several orders of magnitude and even more determined.  Such protests would have to have the effect of figuratively ‘stopping society in its tracks’…”

Clearly this organization has crossed the line and its leadership should be arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit treason, conspiracy to incite violence and other charges as appropriate. If the Obama Justice Department and the FBI does not immediately move to halt their schemes, we will know that they are complicit. One of the demands of this organization will be to stop the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States and hold new elections.  We also know that in the past week, the DHS has made the unprecedented move to inject Federal oversight of the election systems. While these items could be a coincidence, it is certainly suspicious timing with President Obama having less than 10 days remaining in office.

The key element of the Refuse Fascism argument for new elections is the CIA sponsored propaganda related to Russian interference in the U.S. Presidential Election. This “fake news” appears to be integrally connected with their overthrow plot and could indicate some level of cooperation. The level of deception contained in the most recent two reports alleging Russian interference in the election is quite remarkable. I suggest the following article from ZeroHedge is a responsible overview of the issues.

The Refuse Fascism leadership is the “who’s who” of Communist and Islamic Revolutionaries, including:

They have also received significant support and endorsement from members of the media and entertainment industry, including:

  • Marc Lamont Hill, CNN
  • Ed Asner, actor
  • Rosie O’Donnell, comedian, actor
  • Margaret Cho, comedian, actor

The organization is “a project of Alliance for Global Justice”. The Alliance for Global Justice was founded in February 1979 when solidarity activists formed the Nicaragua Network.

“The Nicaragua Network was the leading Nicaragua solidarity organization in the 1980s after the triumph of the Sandinista Revolution over the US-backed Somoza dictatorship. Tens of thousands of current and former activists throughout the progressive movement cut their activist teeth on coffee or cotton picking brigades to Nicaragua or by building schools, health clinics and houses in Nicaragua and witnessing directly the consequences of US imperialism, but also the courage of ordinary people who were fighting back.”


“Sandinistas always told the Nicaragua Network, “What you can do to most help us is to change your own government.”  We took that instruction to heart in 1990 when the Sandinistas lost an election due to overwhelming US interference and funding as well as the Nicaraguan peoples’ exhaustion from nine years of the US-sponsored Contra terrorist war.”

The Alliance for Global Justice receives funding from a number of left-wing philanthropies, including George Soros‘s Open Society Institute and the Tides Foundation.

All information that our Operation Hypo team has collected, including video, audio, planning documents and personnel rosters will be delivered to the DC Metropolitan Police Department and other authorities as appropriate.

Comments and Opinion from NavyJack:

I get in a lot of hot water with Yoda, Cal, Chip and others here if I speculate or provide my opinion in an article, so as a general rule I refrain from offering my opinion. This time, I am going to break that rule. Please consider the following as my opinion.  Because of the dedication of the Oath Keepers involved in Operation HYPO, we are currently experts on the issue of protest organizations planning to stop or screw-up the Presidential Inauguration. Because of OPSEC you can either choose to believe me or not. If you have any doubts that I am being truthful, ask Stewart for his opinion.

What I believe will happen is a series of increasingly agitated protests starting this Saturday January 14. As new protesters are bused into town, the level and number of issues will escalate. These protests could easily result in riots. The DC Police will be stretched. None of the violence will be all that serious. A few assaults, small fires, broken windows, vehicles destroyed, traffic jams because of road closures, disruption of Metro subway service, etc. The DC residence of VP-Elect Mike Pence will be protested on the afternoon/evening of the 18th. There will be vandalism.

On the evening of the 19th things will escalate significantly. Guests attending the Citizens for Trump “DeploraBall” at the National Press Club will be assaulted just like we saw on TV in Albuquerque and San Jose during the run-up to the election.  I will be there as a concerned citizen with other Patriots doing whatever I can to help the police protect innocent civilians. I just cannot sit and watch another Albuquerque or San Jose attack on innocent women and children. I can’t do it.  Once this violence ends, they will either have the number of protesters needed to start making demands or not. I believe they will fall short. I believe they will still make demands, but they will not have the weight of enough protesters to justify any action other than containment.  Because of the increased level of violence, by the evening of the 19th, the DC National Guard will be on the street. SpecOps personnel from Ft. McNair will be on the street. FBI HRT and other sniper teams will be on every rooftop.  I believe the protesters will be largely contained to McPherson Square Park and the White House Ellipse. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

Inauguration Day will be marred with hundreds of “Direct Action” events. Key roads and bridges into the city will be blocked at least temporarily. The DC Police have decided to just “wait and see” instead of being proactive and arresting those plotting these direct actions.  The security entrances into the inauguration viewing areas will be blocked with protesters chained together and chained to the entry portal fences. Protesters will attempt to block the Inauguration Parade following the Inauguration Ceremony at 13th Street. USMC personnel will most likely have to clear them out if they succeed. There are literally hundreds of these actions planned by dozens of organizations. Training for these actions will be taking place at various locations including American University starting on Saturday. It could all be stopped, but it won’t be stopped. You already know why it won’t be stopped. It will be a long day for all of us there.

Donald Trump will become our 45th President, but the stain caused by the protests will be permanent. On the evening on the inauguration, three of the major inauguration balls will be disrupted; two in DC and one in Virginia. Authorities and organizers have been informed. Protests will continue until at least January 23.


About Author

Navy Jack

During my service I deployed on various platforms, including submarines, amphibious assault units and special boats. I participated in expeditionary and humanitarian missions to the North Atlantic, Iran, Beirut, Libya, and the Caribbean. I am a Patron Life Member of the NRA. I am an Oath Keeper Life Member.


  1. George 10 January, 2017, 13:31

    “One of the demands of this organization will be to stop the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States and hold new elections. We also know that in the past week, the DHS has made the unprecedented move to inject Federal oversight of the election systems. While these items could be a coincidence, it is certainly suspicious timing with President Obama having less than 10 days remaining in office.

    Yes indeed; the move to institute Federal oversight of the election system is VERY suspicious. I know that I am not alone in having had suspicions that Obama might make a last minute attempt at martial law with the objective of ruling past the days of his last term in office. It has also been obvious that a significant portion of the black populace in the US does not want to relinquish the benefits of having a “brother” in the Presidential Office has brought them (as well as having a black Attorney General, etc.). The pieces of this puzzle seem to be coming together before our very eyes and the result looks very, very frightening.

    Reply this comment
    • Stewart Rhodes 10 January, 2017, 15:10

      George, you point out an unfortunate Obama “legacy” of an increasingly racially divided America, with Obama and his fellow traveler Marxists working relentlessly through “identity politics” to get Americans to identify by race, not by nationality (as in, as AMERICANS), and that agenda has been especially strong among blacks, but also among Hispanics in America. And, as is the standard communist strategy, the mantra is that America is inherently racist, our Constitution is racist, capitalism (and free markets in general) are racist, the entire Western Civilization is racist, oppressive, and imperialistic, and the only way any black or Hispanic American will ever be safe, free, or happy is if our entire way of life, our entire civilization, and our Constitution, is overthrown and replaced with something else.

      And after eight years of Obama being THE most divisive president in our history, they have been very successful in brainwashing millions of black Americans to do all of that – to identify by race rather than simply as Americans, and to see anyone who is not a Marxist/leftist as a “racist” and to believe that the nation they live in is really their enemy.

      We need to make sure we do all we can to counter this conditioning, and we also need to make sure we don’t fall for that same divide and conquer strategy ourselves, while also being realists about how divided this nation now is.

      Reply this comment
      • Cal 10 January, 2017, 17:51

        Exactly correct! Great answer.

        Reply this comment
      • Joe 11 January, 2017, 02:45

        Is there sufficient numbers of police and military protection to abate such an action in DC? And if not, what is our strategy to foil these plans? You

        Reply this comment
      • WGP 11 January, 2017, 08:24

        Everyone here is making good points.

        What’s interesting is that most all, military, federal, state, county and city employees have mandatory diversity training. So, at the top of the pyramid we have leadership promoting hate and division, while the rank and file are being drilled and indoctrinated on acceptance and tolerance. Private sector corporations also promotes diversity through mandatory participation training.

        We saw the protests following the election fizzle mostly because they are young, unemployed and in some cases paid to play those games. They simply have no stamina. just don’t see enough of these chaos promotions amounting to much. Law enforcement and the public are tired of their destructive crap. Big city governments along with property owners aren’t going to tolerate any long term burning and pillage like we saw in Ferguson MI.

        Reply this comment
      • Skyfang 11 January, 2017, 10:32

        As one of the “Older Boys of the Club” ……….After Vietnam, when my “Juices were still flowing” I got involved with the Central American situation where the Communists tried to pull off mass REVOLUTIONS in the regions. It was Contras (Goodguys) VS Sandanistas ( Bad guys). While I was helping the Contras, Bill DeBlasio (Mayor of NY CITY) was stacking Grenades for the Communist Sandanistas ( No LIE !!!!)

        Stewart has a good handle on what is in store for us, prior too and during the INAUGURATION of DONALD TRUMP !!!!! I would include however, MERYL STREEP as a co-supporter of the Hollywood branch of the “Refuse Fascism” organization, and also JANE FONDA who is taking a back seat this time around because she is much too obvious a “COMMUNIST BIG SHOT”…….. and her presence at RALLY’S would generate TOO many old VIETNAM VETERANS with M40A5 Sniper Rifles ready to take care of business !!!

        Put this in your Bonnets !!!! Last year, Presidents of three Central American Nations ( all leaning politically to the “left of Cuba”, visited the “Oval Office” of Obama to discuss whatever LEFTISTS discuss when they are alone. Soon after we witnessed the LARGEST infiltration of CENTRAL AMERICAN YOUNGSTERS most of whom could shoulder an AK-47 quite handily. Now get this……..The President of El Salvador was FORMER “COMMANDANTE, SANCHEZ CEREN” who was the key COMMUNIST LEADER of the FMLN in the Region and was responsible for the MURDER of over 70,000 El Salvadoran civilians in his rise to power as PRESIDENT !!!!! The main reason for his success in Politics, was that he ASSASSINATED ALL HIS OPPOSITION !!!!!!!

        I wonder why All these Central American PRESIDENTS were huddled in Obama’s Office that day ??????

        There is NO DOUBT in MY MIND that there was “NO GOOD” accomplished that day for the UNITED STATES. But as an “OLD SOLDIER”, I notice these seemingly innocuous events tucked deeply away in some two sentence column in a Mississippi Tabloid. Our Intel Ops seem to be missing out on these little drabs of information. Have they been so CO-OPTED, that they are doing the work of our adversaries ???? After 8 years of OBAMA, I think we ALL know the answer to that !!!!

        Reply this comment
      • Mrsnipe 11 January, 2017, 17:54

        As Freedom Works orator C.L.Bryant stated, the real dysfunction among our young in US under progressive liberals is the nexus of victim-comforted-sycophants and “white guilt” that has created snowflakes unable to provide for their own living style and drive!

        Reply this comment
      • Buzz - Warrior Woman translated 11 January, 2017, 21:56

        One of the best way, perhaps, is to arrest Moore and any others that even come near to DC; another is simply supply them with a small is against the law I believe to disrupt a Presidential meeting or inauguration as this is..for the six days leading up to it, arrest everyone that is associated with same, start with Moore, perhaps deport him to Gitmo, then get Streep, Fallon, Reid and many others…use the illegal Patriot Act and NDAA law against them and keep Obama and his ilk postured somewhere else, a long, long ways away?

        Reply this comment
    • Chip 11 January, 2017, 05:30

      Also, to add to Stewarts “on the money” assessment, your view of ” a significant portion of the black populace in the US does not want to relinquish the benefits of having a “brother” in the Presidential Office” may illustrate that Black Americans weren’t the only ones brainwashed. The same characters trying to convince the majority of us that we were the minority, are the very same actors attempting to misrepresent Black reality. Have you noticed that white snowflakes outnumber blacks in most of the BLM footage? I’m willing to bet that way, way more Black people either identify with, or aspire to be like Dr. Ben Carson, Thomas Sowell, and Allan West before the likes of Obama, Sharpton, or Jackson.

      Reply this comment
    • dahl 11 January, 2017, 11:20

      The Communists can never succeed in a coup. The Patriots have all the guns. If it becomes a fight of good against eveil they won’t get very far

      Reply this comment
    • Edwin Vieira 11 January, 2017, 12:15

      There is no provision in the law for holding “new elections”, even if Trump were not inaugurated (for whatever reason). The law provides for a set procedure for the selection of the President without any “new election”. So that part of their plan is hopeless from the start. Massive disruptions in the streets may be incited; but the law also provides for dealing with such events. If the situation were really one of incipient neo-Bolshevik revolution that could not be put down through normal police methods, the law provides the perfect remedy in 10 U.S.C. secs. 332 and 333. In any event, it is difficult to imagine any one of the three speakers in the video as being capable of rousing revolutionary fervor in anyone. None of them is a Lenin, a Trotsky, or even a Zinoviev.

      Reply this comment
  2. flinter 10 January, 2017, 13:43

    Gee wiz Mr Dix. Thank you so much for telling me what I need. I guess I have been living in denial all these years. NOT….!!!!!
    To the GUY/GAL With the screwed up hair doo….Get a clue. You look and sound like a cartoon. certainly not to be taken seriously.
    Not surprised that Rosie oduchebag supports these traitors. Still waiting for that dumb bitch to make good on her word and move to Canada. But then who in their right mind would actually think that her word is worth dog @#$%….No offence intended to dog @#$%

    Reply this comment
  3. Chip 10 January, 2017, 13:45

    They know its now or never. Soros is beginning to feel the heat. Great work NJ, this info needs to get out to all our LEO networks. Personally I anticipate a fading fizzle from these goons, but better safe than sorry is always the way to go. I am planning to be there on the 20th…I encourage as many of us as possible to do the same. Travel in minimum groups of three. Good luck all!

    Reply this comment
    • Navy Jack Author 10 January, 2017, 14:35

      Chip – I certainly hope you are right (fading fizzle). I have seen it go both ways with RevCom involved. The issue is the shear number of people that are coming to protest and the anxiety that these people have regarding Trump. It is totally irrational. I have never seen a coordinated campaign that was this effective in causing people to rise up. It is remarkable when you are in their meetings to feel their anger and hatred towards people like you and me because of their fear of Trump.

      Reply this comment
      • Chip 10 January, 2017, 15:14

        Absolutely right on all counts. I know you suggested Obama’s position is questionable in all of this, but honestly, I see Obama, Lynch and all of their ilk throwing in completely. They’ve instigated it all…what else have they got. To be honest, I’m praying for the fizzle…but the hatred pot is boiling over. I think we just have to overwhelm them with a massive turnout of patriots.

        Reply this comment
      • Edwin Vieira 11 January, 2017, 11:12

        They do not fear Trump…they fear “people like you and me”.

        Reply this comment
        • Chip 12 January, 2017, 04:14

          Edwin…I wonder. They should fear us, as our government should fear us. But I don’t think they fear us because I don’t believe they think we exist. I believe they’ve been “led” to see us as a diminished handful of cranky white guys…just as they’ve been led to see Trump as the evil “fascist”.

          Reply this comment
  4. Norton II 10 January, 2017, 13:59

    Thanks Navy Jack for such an in depth report. I don’t know however how seriously we should take all this. Is it mostly keyboard fulmination ? After our experience at Malhure, I can guarantee that this outfit is infested with “Confidential Human Sources” and any info your HYPO guys may get may actually be coming from them. Google “Who was John Killman ?” for the story of one of the many CHSs at Malhure. Guarding the credibility of OK should come first, and I suggest a critical vetting of any straws in the wind before they are passed on. Please remember that many of us rely on Oathkeepers for the straight skinny, and this reliance on your reports be particularly important in our decision to respond to a call to action.

    Reply this comment
    • Navy Jack Author 10 January, 2017, 14:24

      Norton II – I am always torn between getting what information I can out to the membership and OPSEC. OPSEC always wins, always will. If you were to attend one of these meetings you would quickly learn that if they knew you were a Oath Keeper, you would not be walking out without a beating or worse. We have a significant amount of detail from our HUMINT that cannot be published online without compromising the source. The source is always a trusted Oath Keeper that has taken some level of risk to access the information. With regard to this particular organization, they have the leadership, the support of DisruptJ20, the SDS and ANSWER Coalition. They have access to money. These 4 groups will easily have over 100,000 protesters in DC NLT Jan 17. A total of 500,000 is not out of the question. From that point forward it will be a question of nerve not manpower. If the leadership believes they will get a passive response from President Obama, they will move forward with their plans and start making demands. The fact that RevCom is central to their operation also says that they have no limits on how far they may be willing go to achieve their goal. I cannot speak for President Obama and your guess is as good as mine as to what his response will be to their threats and their demands.

      Reply this comment
      • Norton II 10 January, 2017, 22:23

        Thanks NJ for your reply. I didn’t mean to question you, You know a hell of a lot more about these things than the old cook. I do feel that if these clowns play hell on Jan 20, they will repel, rather than persuade, those solid responsible Americans – of all colors – that we are trying to RTI. Yes, Obama is surely aware of this development, but it would seem that he could defuse the whole thing with a few words. Silence or aquiesence on his part will be equal to encouragement.

        Reply this comment
        • Cal 11 January, 2017, 18:24

          Norton II, you’re an American, it is your duty to question anyone who serves/served in any position within our government. Navy Jack knows that, and should not require any apology from you. Here he is standing for the US Constitution, not any agency, not any person as that is the requirement of all Oath takers by that Oath and document.

          Never apologize for seeking more knowledge, for questioning where information comes from, etc, from anyone. Never let anyone tell you what to think whatever position they occupy/occupied. Never assume that someone knows more and that they do not need to be questioned. That is how those who are working to destroy our nation got into place.

          I am sure that Navy Jack agrees with me that it is appropriate that you question source material.

          God Bless and Stay Safe All!

          If there were never intended to be action to defend the Constitution from those who are domestically attempting to destroy its power and authority, why would each Oath require it of those who take the Oaths?

          Chief Tecumseh: “When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.”

          Reply this comment
  5. WGP 10 January, 2017, 17:04

    I’ll add that LEO’s and any who are watching this closely as oath abiding need to disregard any attempt at marshal law. Also, beware of the federal agencies that are heavily armed taking to the streets. These would be the true mercenary traitors to deal with. I imagine the military high command following the current leadership over the bridge, however the 80% that are awake will not likely follow that path.

    The president elect and congress should move forward, disregarding the current administrations attempt at such marshaling. If need be, have him detained and jailed.

    As for the protesters, well I guess we know where they are and so does our military, national guard, LEO’s and militia. An ever greater divide would ensue with their actively attempting to retain the bathhouse barry imposter in the rainbow house. With that said, it will turn into a racial war. I wonder who win that?

    Meanwhile our true enemies, states who would gladly push the war button will find us vulnerable. Depending on how much wealth they will never see if the USA folds might deter their aggression, only leaving the islamic terrorist and home grown Soros followers in the streets as targets. Remove their obvious leaders and the rest will fail.

    Trump is in no mood for lawlessness. Neither am I. I think there will be plenty of law enforcement keeping the lid on protesters and civil disorder as they are receiving true support from our newly elected president; conversely only hate and division and more shootings from Barryo

    Prepared and Vigil.

    Reply this comment
  6. Norton II 10 January, 2017, 22:37

    One more bit : The “Facist” hyperbole these people are spouting rings a bell….when was it ?….oh yes ! Patty Hearst and the Symbionese Liberation Army ! A few years from now, these ANTIFA miscreants will be as little remembered as Patty. Here’s an interesting question : what has SPLC and ADL had to say about all this ?

    Reply this comment
  7. Acquired-awaiting 11 January, 2017, 00:01

    Getting to the source of the firestarters would be a move in the right direction. Neutralizing of a high profile individual responsible for inciting and threatening mass civil disobedience while espousing and spewing race-baiting anti-American rhetoric would be of top 5 priority. Remove the fuel before it consumes oxygen.

    Reply this comment
    • L999here 11 January, 2017, 08:55

      Agree in the extreme. Local Oath Keeper’s need to be aware of these situations in their AO and reach out to local LE. As a business owner,this could be worse than Fergason,MO and Baltimore,MD. My area…N. IN….is not as vulnurable as many other large population centers,but we are too close to Chicago to not be aware of the problems. Situational awareness,contact with local LE and being armed will be the most important. Being ready to stop any disruptions before they get started will depend on the individual. Personally…I will shoot any looters or those who intend to harm any person or damage property. This is why the riots in LA (1995) were stopped by Korean shop and business owners.

      Reply this comment
  8. ssgtgood 11 January, 2017, 08:15

    Right wing conservatives are NOT FASCISTS! Fascists are socialists from beginning to end. Nazis are also fascists and the official name was the National Democrat SOCIALISTS Party and are not right wing at all Seems no one knows any history anymore. I’m sick of it. If we were fascists we would have killed all the liberals long ago because that what fascists do. We’re freedom loving Americans and we’re not about to lets a bunch of liberals shove this crap down our throats. No way!

    ssgtgood USMC
    Semper Fidelis
    Sic Semper Tyrannis
    Molon Labe

    Reply this comment
  9. MarkOwen 11 January, 2017, 08:19

    Don’t look like the left is going to let up(if ever). This will go on for 4 to 8 years depending on election results. Violence is coming, already here in some places, we as oathkeepers have to stand for our Constitutional rights as our creedo demands.

    Reply this comment
  10. Sgt. Reaper 11 January, 2017, 08:26

    I would suggest caution, especially when discussing an armed response to protesters. Fastest way to give the current administration an excuse to declare marshal law is to give the protesters an excuse to get violent. I can’t see the active military taking part in action against American patriots except in the case of open fighting in American streets. In that case, people dead from the actions of LEO and military trying to break up a fight are just as dead. Don’t get baited into the kill-zone.

    Reply this comment
    • Navy Jack Author 11 January, 2017, 12:00

      Sgt. Reaper, I agree with you 100%

      Reply this comment
      • Cal 11 January, 2017, 18:45

        Navy jack, I am sure that you understand that there is no position in government that has any lawful authority to call for “martial law” or “emergency powers”, anymore then one who serves can lawfully give himself First Degree Murder powers (assassination powers).

        So I am going to take this that you mean that they may unlawfully call for “martial law”/”emergency powers”, but that you recognize it as treason, and those who implement it/them as *terrorists. If there is any question talk to Dr. Vieira, as he can explain it in a less controversial manner then I.

        *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

        Reply this comment
    • Cal 11 January, 2017, 18:39

      ” Fastest way to give the current administration an excuse to declare marshal law…”

      You must start to understand that here in the USA, under the US Constitution – which is still our government, not the people who serve within it – there is NO SUCH THING AS “martial law”, nor is there any such thing as “emergency powers”; they are both just open declarations of TREASON, and that *Terrorism will be used against the American people.

      Have you not read the document that you are Oath bound to?

      “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.”The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866

      This has NOT changed, only that we now have domestic enemies and traitors serving within our governments.

      More modern version that I am sure you will be more comfortable with, then followed by Dr. Vieira on this topic on where the idea of “emergency powers”, etc comes from, and it is NOT the US Constitution.

      “Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency.” Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425 (1934)

      Dr. Edwin Vieira: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides… The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights… The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.

      … the famous case Norton v. Shelby County… The Court said: “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties. It is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” And that applies to any (and all) governmental action outside of the Constitution…”

      What are the defining characteristics of a limited government? They are its disabilities; what it does not have legal authority to do. Look at the First Amendment… What does it do? It guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of religion. But how does it do that? I quote: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press” etcetera. “Congress shall make no law;” that’s a statement of an absence of power. That’s a statement of a disability.

      If we go to the doctrine of “Emergency Powers,”… what was the foundational case that put that doctrine on the constitutional map? It was Knox vs. Lee, the legal tender cases brought after the Civil War. …
      … read a dissenting opinion by Justice Stephen Field, the only Justice on the Supreme Court who had the integrity to dissent in every legal tender case that he heard. He wrote a dissenting opinion in Dooley vs. Smith, in 1872. He wrote, “The arguments in favor of the constitutionality of legal tender paper currency tend directly to break down the barriers which separate a government of limited powers from a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress. Those limitations must be preserved, or our government will inevitably drift from the system established by our Fathers into a vast, centralized, and consolidated government.”

      You notice he was not talking specifically about the monetary powers. He wasn’t saying that these arguments would lead to the monetary powers being unrestrained. It was destroying the concept of limited government. “The arguments in favor of the constitutionality of legal tender paper currency tend directly to break down the barriers which separate a government of limited powers from a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress.” How do you define, or how would you characterize, a government resting in the unrestrained will of Congress, or any other political body? It is by definition a totalitarian government…

      The Federal Reserve System was there when the greatest banking collapse in American history occurred, in 1932-1933, and in what was called the Great Depression of the 1930s. In that period what happened? The Roosevelt New Deal. What were the powers they were screaming for? Emergency powers. You’ll find that written into many statutes, e.g., The Emergency Banking Act of 1933. You should pay attention to the title, The Emergency Banking Act of 1933, and the “Aggregate Powers” doctrine. It’s been all downhill since then.

      How should that have been done? Well, Americans would have had to understand and enforce their Constitution. You notice I say Americans, not the Congress or the Supreme Court, because who is the final arbiter of this document? [holding a copy of the Constitution] It is not Congress, and it is not the Supreme Court. It is “we the people.” Read the thing. How does it start? “We the people do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States”; not “we the politicians,” not “we the judges.” Those people are the agents of the people. We the people are the principals.
      The doctrine is very clear that, being the principals, we are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters and enforcers. You don’t have to take my word for it. Let’s go back to the Founding Fathers…” (End Dr. Vieira quote. We the people are the Constitution’s ultimate interpreters. (Dr. Edwin Vieira, ))

      In times of crisis presidents often lay claim to extraordinary powers to preserve the nation. Such emergency powers are neither granted expressly to the president nor delegated to Congress by the Constitution. Instead, they are judged to reside purely in the need for leaders to protect national sovereignty and domestic order. The mandate in Article II that the president “preserve, protect and defend” the US Constitution and uphold its provisions is considered (by those who want those powers) to contain implicitly the notion of emergency powers. Yet that cannot be true since they are required to “PRESERVE”, not only “protect and defend” the US Constitution. In actuality all US Presidents are held to a higher standard then everyone else as they are the ones charges with implementing the “laws of the land” – all that are IN Pursuance thereof the US Constitution. The wording of the Presidential Oath was established in the Constitution in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8.

      ‘Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”’

      Notice that the Framers placed the presidential Oath of Office after the beginning clauses which set forth the organization of the executive department, and before the ending clauses that specify the contours of the President’s assigned power. The President is required to take the oath after he assumes the office but before he can lawfully execute it. The location and phrasing of the Oath of Office Clause strongly suggest that it is not empowering, but that it is limiting – the clause limits how the President’s “executive power” is to be exercised.

      At this time in our country it is critical for all who have taken/will take the Oath understand the document to which that Oath binds them. That is not a difficult task as it is a VERY short document.

      Reply this comment
  11. Chico 11 January, 2017, 08:39

    The answer would have been very simple.. We should have arrested these elitist bastards a long time ago. What makes anyone think they are above the law and can get away with what they have been perpetrating.
    George Soros for one should be in PRISON long ago. Along with the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds. and until they are we will continue to have these problems. SIMPLE SOLUTION!! LOCK EM UP!!! I hate to say this but this country is full of cowards and people with no moral backbone. Let me know when you wake the hell up.. TALK TALK TALK.. Just like Hitlery. They have had enough to lock her and that pedo of a husband up years ago. Not a thing has happened.

    Reply this comment
  12. TRUTH 11 January, 2017, 08:55

    They will not be allowed to take over our country, to many true patriots will not let this happen.

    Reply this comment
  13. teacher 11 January, 2017, 08:57

    I’m worried about us if we’re worried about this. Trump is a facist, but so are the neo- liberals. Our elections and the problem of corporations being given “personhood” to be allowed to purchase their chosen politicians and policies ought to rise to the level of concern given these marginal seditionists.

    Reply this comment
  14. anjen 11 January, 2017, 09:08

    Praise our Creator God, we still have “real men” who raise their standards to be heard. It is men like you who will make America Great Again, because you have stood in the gap.

    Reply this comment
  15. Zantura 11 January, 2017, 09:25

    OMG!!!! Though I am an US Veteran, I wasn’t born here. I came as a child; however I’ve come to love this country as my own, ergo why I enlisted. Was married to a Marine.husband, had an Army son. This is MY home! And I loathe what has been done to it from the inside. I’ve been seeing the writing on the wall for some time. I do read between the lines. I see body language. I read articles like this one, and others. And, I’m asked oftentimes, “do you believe everything you read/see on the internet”? Or told “oh, it cannot possibly be as bad as you think it is”…My usual response to these naysayers is “hope I’m wrong, but only time will tell”. It is very scary!!! I am not as prepared as well as I would like to be, regrettably. After all, in spite of MY Oath, I’m a 65 year old disabled woman. No means to defend myself at all. No means to help my fellow Oath Keepers if a crisis should arise. All I can do is shake my head in disbelief, and try really hard to maintain a modicum or glimmer of hope that everything will work out. But will it? Will the next generations, my sons, their children wake up to the America our Forefathers envisioned? Thanks so much for keeping us well informed, while they’re destroying us from within.

    Reply this comment
  16. tictock 11 January, 2017, 09:37

    It might have flames for a few hours or days. The media will do what it can to help fan flames but these protesters are assuredly going to lose interest when money stops flowing. Soros piling it on while he still breathes air.
    Let them protest. The kids will eventually go home.

    Reply this comment
  17. Nick 11 January, 2017, 09:38

    I must live in a completely different world than most because out of all the people I know, and interact with they believe much of what groups like Refuse state, and far too much of what they hear from the media.
    I have a son who is a NYC cop, and he certainly doesn’t know any others who recognize that they are being lied to. I can tell you that my experience has been when working with police that they will vote for whom they perceive will protect their paychecks, and the same goes for the teachers unions.
    I guess when you live in the most densely populated state in the Union and work in NYC, both now overrun with migrants, you just can’t get the feel of what is actually going on in this nation.

    Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*