Navarro Gets Dramatic in the Bunkerville Courtroom

Navarro Gets Dramatic in the Bunkerville Courtroom

by Shari Dovale


Monday marked the first full day of jury deliberations in the first of three trials being held in Las Vegas.

6 men are on trial for their roles in the Bunkerville protest with Cliven Bundy in 2014.

After 5+ weeks of the government presenting their case with over 35 witnesses, the defense was not allowed to present the case they originally planned. They had attempted to call 30 witnesses, but Judge Navarro did not allow some of them, and most were threatened with prosecution if they testified. They ended with about 2 days for their case.

Eric Parker was the only defendant to testify, and that was due to his belief that it would be the only way Navarro would allow their side to be told.

The jury sent questions back to the court, which Judge Gloria Navarro promptly sealed from the public’s view. The public was, however, allowed to hear the court consider their responses to the jury. It was possible to get a general idea of what the questions involved.

It seems the jury had ‘hypothetical’ questions pertaining to the possibility of a hung jury. This means they do not have consensus on all of the 60+ charges the defendants are facing.

Judge Navarro was concerned enough that the jury was considering all of the possible implications that, at one point, she threw her arms wide, then bringing them slowly back together. She said that they need to guide the jurors back down to a more narrow point of view as they could be looking at sentencing implications, and other extremes.

Navarro still seems to be mostly concerned with the prospect of jury nullification.

The prosecutors also talked about the probability of a hung jury.

It would seem that the court, Navarro and the government prosecutors, are concerned the jurors are looking at more than the government’s case. There appear to be some jurors that do not agree with the court’s narrative.

The jurors continue their second day of deliberations Tuesday.


From Redoubt News


If you believe in the mission of Oath Keepers, to defend the Constitution
against all enemies,  foreign and domestic, please consider making a donation to support our work.   You can donate HERE.

 

Comments

  1. lc65 19 April, 2017, 13:42

    Not really surprising. Most reasonable American recognize injustice when they see it.

    Reply this comment
  2. 175gr 19 April, 2017, 18:23

    Jury MUST move for NULLIFICATION.

    Reply this comment
  3. Shame Navarro 19 April, 2017, 18:29

    Let wisdom reign over tyranny and dishonor. Keep handing out the Jury Nullification info. The Feds and corrupt hate allowing the Citizens realize their true power in this system.
    Utterly despicable how the Judge is leading the jury and not allowing defendant witnesses. How is that just?
    After the trial citizens need to PEACEFULLY and VOCALLY confront the Judge when she is out and about in her daily affairs. They need to call her out for violating her Oath to the Constitution. In past times she would have enjoyed tar and feathers for such contempt for rights and justice.
    Unless you address these Goons in public and mock and ridicule them outright they will have no concern of continuing this treasonous behavior. Again NOT advocating or calling for any violence towards them BUT peacefully calling them out with a bit of public shaming.

    Reply this comment
  4. Nancy Oakley Author 20 April, 2017, 07:27

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*