BIG PHARMA & THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
Promoters of Illegal “Gun-free” Zones and the Globalist Agenda
by James Jaeger
It’s always the same pattern of conduct: another shooting, another gun-free zone, media focuses attention on shooter and victims. Never does the MainStream Media (MSM) mention that almost every mass shooting has at least two elements in common:
A. Gun-Free Zones
B. Psychiatric drugs
Why is this? Why do networks like CNN, MSNBC, FOX NEWS, NBC/Universal, ABC, CBS and other MainStream networks fail to focus on, or even mention, A and B as the source of the problem?
The answer is easy for anyone paying attention. The MainStream Media and Big Pharma are abettors of the Globalist Agenda. The Globalist Agenda — as exemplified by the Counsel on Foreign Relations (CFR) mission — is to compromise, then remove national boundaries from all countries in order to facilitate global trade under a new system of laws and regulations, such as GATT, NAFTA and the TPP. In order to do this, the Agenda calls for the mitigation of national sovereignties and the re-organization of countries under the jurisdiction of global organizations, such as the UN, the World Trade Org, the World Bank and the World Court. Further, in order to accomplish this, the right to “keep and bear arms” must be terminated in all nations, especially the U.S. The Globalists understand that act of a population being armed is the only thing that gives that population leverage against their tyranny and the runaway police powers of the state. The right to keep and bear as part of a well-regulated militia is the ultimate check and balance.
Thus, the MainStream Media never discusses the 4th and 5th reasons for gun ownership, such full complement of reasons being:
1. Target shooting.
3. Self defense.
4. A deterrent against tyranny.
5. Duty to be armed and trained for state militia service.
Again, points 4 and 5 are almost NEVER mentioned on any of the anti-Constitutional MainStream networks.
The pundits and opinion leaders in the MSM — by failing to mention reasons 4 and 5 — are not only failing to “look after the folks” they are abettors of the crime of Constitutional infringement. Infringement is the term used by the Founders in the Second Amendment, the Amendment which states:
“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
As Sheriff Richard Mack points out, another word for “infringe” is “hinder.” Thus any act that hinders the application of the Second Amendment is a violation of the highest law in the land.
Thus any “law” that the Gun-control Lobby makes that in any way HINDERS the right to keep and bear arms is a violation, hence a crime. And here is the reason, per the U.S. Supreme Court, which as ruled on two very important issues via a number of cases:
In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court held that “It cannot be presumed, that ANY clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect.”(1)
And in Norton v. Shelby County, the Supreme Court further held that “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it imposes no duties; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed”.(2)
The right to “keep and bear arms” is present in the Constitution in four separate places therefore — per Marbury v. Madison — it has legal import in four separate places. Any “law” or “regulation” that is made by the Federal or state governments, executive order or court president which is inconsistent with the right to “keep and bear arms” would — per Norton v. Shelby County — “impose no duties” and would be “in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
This is the law whether people like it or not. It is also high law, because it comes directly from the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the Land. Thus, the legislators and other government officials that have passed gun-control legislation have violated the law. These public officials will therefore have to eventually be charged, impeached or reprimanded for violating their oaths of office. In the meantime, elected officials that pass or attempt to pass any additional “gun legislation” should be compiled for future action.
Thus, when the MSM fails to mention the fact that mass shootings almost always occur in “gun free” zones AND they fail to mention that almost ALL of the shooters are involved with pharmaceutical drugs, they are abetting crime in order to benefit from unjust enrichment.
Most people don’t realize that the MainStream Media derives most of it’s enrichment (income) from TV spots paid for by the pharmaceutical corporations. “Big Pharma” is thus the MSM’s number one client. Given this, Big Pharma and the MSM hire lobby firms to petition Congress to pass “laws” that benefit their business arrangement.
One of the “laws” that Big Pharma got passed quite a while back is a law that prevents the public from knowing what pharmaceutical drugs an individual is on. This is private information.
While this author fully agrees with the Constitution’s mandate that citizens have the right to have private information and be secure in their property and effects, at some point the public’s right to know who is taking dangerous drugs, and exactly what those drugs are, becomes acute.
We are experiencing a chain of mass shootings across this nation and the MainStream Media and Big Pharma are “conspiring” to obfuscate the exact drugs these shooters are on and WHO manufactured them. Under the pretense of 5th Amendment Rights, Big Pharma has used their financial clout to “purchase” Congressmen in DC who have passed “laws” that protect Big Pharma from adverse public relations.
In short, when a shooter goes into a movie theater and kills a bunch of people, Big Pharma does not want you to know that that person was using THEIR product. This is bad for their business. And it’s bad for the network’s business because, if a major pharmaceutical drug is pulled off the market, the TV network loses hundreds of millions in advertising revenue.
So Big Pharma and the MainStream Media could be said to be in collusion. They are not only in collusion with each other, they are jointly in collusion with the Gun-Control Lobby, one of the main instruments of the Globalists.
Every time there is a mass shooting, apologists of the Gun-Control Lobby are given unlimited access to their collusion partner, the MainStream Media. They are all over TV spouting the “reason” for the latest shooting. This access allows them to advance the rationale for disarming the American public because the “reason” is always: “too many citizens have guns and/or the guns are not regulated enough.” Again, seldom/never is the idea that the shooting occurred in another “gun-free zone” and the shooter was on Big Pharma’s product.(3)
So A and B of above are never discussed. And Reasons 4 and 5 for gun ownership are never discussed. The MSM is in total blackout mode on the actual reasons we have the Second Amendment and why the Founders stated that a well regulate Militia is NECESSARY for the security of a FREE STATE.(4)
IN SHORT: THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, BIG PHARMA, THE GUN-CONTROL LOBBY AND THE GLOBALISTS DO NOT WANT A FREE STATE. THEY WANT A ONE-WORLD TOTALITARIAN STATE WHERE THEY MANAGE EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING WITH THEIR DRUGS AND WEAPONS.
The unfortunate problem for them is — in pursuing this goal — they are violating the law. They are not only violating the law, they are violating the highest law in the land, the U.S. Constitution. And, as we have seen above, the highest Court in the Land, the Supreme Court, upholds the U.S. Constitution. It stipulated 1) that there is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that does NOT have legal import and 2) no “law” can be made that fails to be in alignment with anything that IS in the U.S. Constitution.
(1) Also see:
— Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553, 572-73 — Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 151-52 — Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 87 — Blake v. McClung, 172 U.S. 239, 260-61 — Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 534
(2) Also see:
— Huntington v. Worthen, “An unconstitutional act is not a law; it binds no one”.
— Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 376 (1880), “An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. An offence created by it is not a crime.”
(3) Remember how the MainStream Media and even its top brass crucified Tom Cruise — an advocate of non-drug Scientology therapy — when he made disparaging remarks about Brooke Shield’s use of Big Pharma’s product for her postpartum depression? A very big no, no. The message: no matter how many people are murdered by depressed gunmen — Big Pharma never had anything to do with it. The more subtle message: take people’s guns away, never admit that the shooting happened in a “gun-free” zone.
(4) For further information on why the right to “keep and bear” is “necessary” for a “free state,” see the movie “MOLON LABE – How the Second Amendment Guarantees America’s Freedom” such available as a public service at http://www.molon.us/movie Also, see MIDNIGHT RIDE when released, the sister film to MOLON LABE at MidnightRide.us/trailer.
Editor’s Note: I took the following paragraph from an interview published at The Daily Bell on October 05, 2014, at this link —
Introduction: James Jaeger is an award-winning filmmaker who co-founded Matrix Entertainment, which has partnered with Bill Van Alen of Cornerstone Entertainment and constitutional attorney Edwin Vieira Jr. to produce a series of feature-length political documentaries centering on the U.S. Constitution. One of the first documentaries was FIAT EMPIRE about the Federal Reserve System, featuring Congressman Ron Paul, which garnered a Telly Award and went viral as the #1 film on the Internet for six months. Matrix Productions continues to develop, produce and market cutting-edge motion pictures.