Is Dr. Swain’s Op-Ed for “The Hill” Blocked by SPLC?

Is Dr. Swain’s Op-Ed  for “The Hill” Blocked by SPLC?

“Right now, it looks like the SPLC has the power to block a well-researched article that questions its credibility.”  From Dr. Swain’s facebook page on January 11, 2018



  1. Obbop 15 January, 2018, 19:14

    The basic principal behind the adage remains true: “Freedom of the press is a wonderful thing… for those who can afford the presses.”

    Reply this comment
  2. Paul 16 January, 2018, 16:03

    Post it here on Oath Keepers. I’ll make sure to distribute it widely.

    Reply this comment
    • HighlanderJuan 16 January, 2018, 16:47

      I agree. Posting info about the article, without posting a link to the actual article does not help anyone understand or actually help the process.

      Reply this comment
  3. MikeW 16 January, 2018, 16:42

    I strongly suggest that this issue be taken to Tucker Carlson at Fox News. He also believes, from what I’ve seen on his show, that SPLC is a hate organization that targets anyone/everyone who does not conform to their ideology.

    Reply this comment
    • Vinny 16 January, 2018, 18:40

      MikeW……your comment about the SPLC being a hate organization is dead center bulls eye. Everything they support and do relates to the destruction of our country and system. They are directly tied to Obama and his agenda and continue to support him and the current “shadow government”. They have a never ending supply of money that comes from George Soros and the Clinton Foundation.

      Reply this comment
  4. G. Giant 16 January, 2018, 17:42

    There are no longer any objective, neutral journalistic organizations. That went away when so many of them turned rabidly and fanatically leftist/communist. The ones that were left had to move right or find they had NO audience at all.
    So I have a suggestion. Make them all join an organization that has some way of rating them according to their political position. Make it objective and neutral. And make them post it at the front of their publication. Something like 100 is an ultra conservative group and 0 is a flaming radical leftist.
    The public REALLY needs this as a guide to know what they should expect.

    Reply this comment
  5. me 16 January, 2018, 18:48

    allowed to published OR allowed to be published?

    Reply this comment
  6. Jack Hinson 16 January, 2018, 19:12

    SPLC = Stupid People Like Commies

    Reply this comment
  7. Lawrence J 16 January, 2018, 19:13

    The SPLC became a corrupt power-player organization not too long after it was formed, but maintained the charade their name implies. What Mike W writes is accurate.

    Reply this comment
  8. Leftyonthemound 16 January, 2018, 21:20

    Typical. The fight is on.

    Reply this comment
  9. Baldo 17 January, 2018, 06:58

    Can we get a copy and publish ourselves?

    Reply this comment
  10. z 17 January, 2018, 08:03

    They will be dealt with in the Storm takedown of the left. Space will be found in some jail, somewhere.

    Reply this comment
  11. Alice K 17 January, 2018, 12:16

    It is up to us to get the message out then. Make sure the link is included in your article to start with and then let’s see if we can get this out through social media. How about the Daily Caller or another conservative blog???

    Reply this comment
  12. kookooracharabioso 18 January, 2018, 03:08

    What a delightful person to discover! On my “to read” list.

    Reply this comment
    • kookooracharabioso 18 January, 2018, 13:08

      She said that the “Hill” asked for the article. Probably a contractual situation with remuneration? I’m interested in her perspective on things. She had every opportunity to fall into the slapstick reactive thought mode but she didn’t.

      Reply this comment

Write a Comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.
Required fields are marked*